My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
08-22-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 10:51:18 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 10:47:24 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 8, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 18 of 21 <br /> <br />(12. ENGINEERING SERVICES, Continued) <br /> <br />Printup asked if the list of firms obtained from the City Engineers Association of Minnesota is Minnesota <br />firms or regional firms. <br /> <br />Loftus stated to her knowledge a number of the smaller ones are located in Minnesota but that she is not <br />personally familiar with all of them. <br /> <br />Printup asked if the list can be broken down detailing where each firm is located. <br /> <br />Loftus stated she can obtain that information. <br /> <br />Printup asked about the sale of Bonestroo to a national engineering firm and added that he has a concern <br />that Orono will go from being an important component of their business to a smaller component. <br /> <br />Loftus stated to her understanding the merger has not gone through yet at this time. <br /> <br />Kellogg stated as long as Bonestroo works for the City of Orono, the City Council will see the same <br />faces. Kellogg indicated the merger will allow them to have more depth to draw from on various projects. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if they would still be comparing apples to apples if they send the RFP to some of the <br />smaller firms and whether that would come out of the same template. <br /> <br />Mattick stated it would depend on what the Council asks for and noted that some engineering firms are <br />very specialized and would not be able to provide all the services the City is looking for from an <br />engineering firm. Mattick stated it would also depend on the job description for the public works <br />director/city engineer position. <br /> <br />Franchot stated it is probably common to have the firm provide a certification that they can provide all of <br />the services being requested. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated that is part of the process. <br /> <br />Printup commented since the RFP process has not been done in quite some time, the Council is giving the <br />citizens the transparency that the City is doing whatever it can to keep costs in line. <br /> <br />Franchot stated he would disagree that it was transparent in the way it was dropped on Staff unexpectedly <br />and that it was anything but transparent. Franchot stated from the comments of the Mayor and Council <br />Member Printup it was clear that this was already decided. Franchot noted Council Member Rahn had <br />also been called by Council Member Printup before he brought it up at the Council meeting. Franchot <br />commented it would be helpful if someone on the council has an idea that they discuss it with the whole <br />group. <br /> <br />Printup noted that is what the Council is doing right now. <br /> <br />Franchot stated that Council Member Printup at the last meeting had motioned immediately to have the <br />issue go through a resolution. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 08/22/2011 <br />Approved Council Meeting Minutes 08/08/2011 <br />[Page 18 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.