My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
08-22-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 10:51:18 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 10:47:24 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 8, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 21 <br /> <br />(5. #11-3514 BRIAN PETERS, 1978 SHADYWOOD ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Franchot stated he thought Council Member Rahn was speaking about keeping the garages in the <br />neighborhood a similar size. Given the size of the lot, a slightly larger garage would not appear to have as <br />much massing. <br /> <br />Rahn stated that is why the City deals in percentages because that takes the lot size into consideration. <br /> <br />Franchot stated in his view the coverage on the subject property is less on a percent basis than on the <br />neighboring basis. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the two neighboring properties got more than what the City’s Code allows and that Council <br />Member Rahn's point is whether this will become the new norm. The question becomes whether the <br />applicant could get by with a 20’ x 20’ or a 22’ x 22’ garage, and that the burden rests with the applicant <br />to convince the City Council that it is necessary. <br /> <br />Brian Peters, Applicant, stated the massing is not near the other two properties and that the 24’ x 24’ <br />allows some functionality to store two cars and a snow blower. Peters stated in his opinion his neighbors <br />would stand up here and say they wish they could have a wider garage. The small lot restricts you from a <br />larger garage but that he has a 100-foot wide lot. Given the larger lot size, the garage would not affect <br />massing. <br /> <br />Franchot asked whether any of the neighbors have voiced opposition to this project. <br /> <br />Peters indicated they have not. The property was purchased through foreclosure and was in need of some <br />repairs. Some of the other houses in the neighborhood do have three car garages but that he is not sure <br />whether they required variances. Peters stated a 24’ x 24’ garage relative to the neighborhood fits in the <br />middle of what is in that immediate area. Peters noted due to the high water table, he is unable to have a <br />basement and the extra two feet does make a big difference. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what the dimensions are on the existing garage. <br /> <br />Peters indicated it is 18' x 22'. <br /> <br />Rahn moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6063, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1435, 78-1403, and 78-1288, for the property <br />located at 1978 Shadywood Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />*6. #11-3515 KEENAN & SVEIVEN ON BEHALF OF GINA PAULUCCI, 320 WOODHILL <br />ROAD – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – RESOLUTION NO. 6064 <br /> <br />Rahn moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6064, a Resolution Granting a <br />Conditional use Permit for Land Alteration Pursuant to Section 78-966 and 78-968 for the property <br />located at 320 Woodhill Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 08/22/2011 <br />Approved Council Meeting Minutes 08/08/2011 <br />[Page 12 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.