My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
01-10-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 10:02:50 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 10:09:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 22 of 27 <br /> <br />(14. #10-3493 GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH, 3745 SHORELINE DRIVE, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />made that the church will use Tract F. Mattick stated as the easement has been represented to him, it does <br />not allow anyone to gain access to the church. <br /> <br />David Owen stated he just became aware of this tonight and that he is doubtful that anyone in the <br />congregation was aware of the easement. Owen stated he cannot represent what the church council will <br />want to do as it relates to the easement. <br /> <br />(Cynthia Bremer leaves at 10:03 p.m.) <br /> <br />Carlson stated they met with the church on this issue approximately one week ago and attempted to get <br />together over the weekend but were unable to due to the bad weather. <br /> <br />Mayor White stated this issue does not relate to the application before them. <br /> <br />Mattick agreed that an easement exists but that the church does not own Tract F any longer, so he is <br />unsure who from the church will use the easement to gain access to the Zachman property. <br /> <br />Margo Henderson, 2464 Dunwoody Avenue, stated she has not been privy to all of the conversations and <br />that she is unsure about the screening being proposed. Henderson asked whether there will be screening <br />in addition to the screening proposed for the Zachman property. <br /> <br />Owen noted they had a meeting with the neighbors on Friday and that Mrs. Henderson’s husband was in <br />attendance. The church has agreed that the whole garden should be screened and the neighbors and <br />church have agreed that a fence would be erected. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether any side views of the fence are available. <br /> <br />Owen displayed some pictures of a fence that they are proposing to construct and the surrounding area <br />near the inurnment garden. The fence would be six feet high. <br /> <br />Franchot commented he does have some empathy for the neighbors and that it is possible at some point in <br />the future the easement will be used by the church. Franchot encouraged them to discuss the issue with <br />the church. <br /> <br />Owen stated he is not in a position to agree to anything regarding the easement tonight but that he would <br />bring it to the church board. Owen stated to his understanding there is no reason for the church to have <br />the easement. <br /> <br />Carlson noted they are opposed to the columbarium. <br /> <br />Zachman asked if they will be able to have more than 140 columbarium spaces at some point in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Curtis stated they would need to come back to the City for approval of any additional spaces. <br /> <br />Murphy asked whether Ms. Zachman is attempting to sell her house at the present time. <br />Item #04 - CC Agenda - 01/10/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 12/13/2010 <br />[Page 22 of 27]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.