Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 8, 2012 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 6 of 21 <br /> <br />(5. #12-3562 ARTHUR J. NELSON ESTATE, 400 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated the applicant is requesting a motion to accept the first amendment to the development <br />contract and to allow the applicant to proceed with a private road established through their homeowner’s <br />association documents. <br /> <br />Franchot moved, Printup seconded, to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the First <br />Amendment to Development Contract; the Road, Drainage and Utilities Easement; and the <br />Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Private Roadway Easement. VOTE: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*6. #12-3572 MATTHEW FRITZ, 4055 ELM STREET – VARIANES – RESOLUTION NO. <br />6172 <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6172, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330, Matthew Fritz and Kristine Fritz, 4055 Elm <br />Street. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />7. #12-3574 DALE GUSTAFSON WITH GUSTAFSON DESIGN, INC., ON BEHALF OF <br />CHRIS PATNODE, 1430 CHERRY PLACE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE <br />– RESOLUTION NO. 6173 <br /> <br />Rahn stated his questions relating to this application are more procedural and asked if the applicant had to <br />pay two fees, one for the conditional use permit and one for the hardcover variance. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it was a total of $700 for both items. <br /> <br />Rahn noted a stairway is allowed hardcover in that zone and asked why it requires a variance. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the Code only allows for minimal hardcover to access the lake and not a meandering <br />staircase. <br /> <br />Rahn asked why Staff recommends approval of that staircase if it creates more hardcover than a straight <br />path. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated they would still require the landings and that Staff feels there would be more opportunity <br />to screen the stairway than a straight stairway down the slope. The amount of grading would also be less <br />invasive as well and would not require a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Rahn stated he did not see in the report where it addresses the width of the stairs. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the survey reflects the width of the stairway. <br /> <br />Rahn asked whether a variance would be required if a homeowner has a lakeside stairway they would like <br />to replace with the same square footage. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it would not require a variance. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 10/22/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/08/2012 [Page 6 of 21]