My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2012 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2012
>
10-22-2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 12:22:12 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:49:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 8, 2012 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 21 <br /> <br />(8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Mrs. Musgjerd indicated they also have concerns about the fire lane. If you visit the site, this lot is <br />basically the entrance to the lake off of the fire lane. Anybody that snowmobiles or walks their dog down <br />to the lake, has to come through this lot and basically go through that little beach area. If you go down by <br />the shore and would like to access the lake, it is about a four foot drop down to the lake. <br /> <br />Rahn stated the City Council does not know what the future use of that path will be and that it is <br />conceivable that the fire lane is improved at some point. <br /> <br />Mrs. Musgjerd stated in her view they are being penalized. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is not aware of this lot being used to access the lake by the public. <br /> <br />Mrs. Musgjerd stated that was the whole point of why they came to the City and asked to work with them <br />to make the whole area better. <br /> <br />McMillan stated obviously people are using private property rather than the fire lane to access the lake <br />and that perhaps that area could be blocked off by the property owner. <br /> <br />Mattick stated he is not sure whether a fence could be erected within the 0-75 foot zone but that the City <br />can help steer people down the right-of-way rather than on to this property. <br /> <br />Mrs. Musgjerd stated they have done everything they can to make the house compliant with the City’s <br />regulations. Musgjerd noted the new residence could be constructed in the same place as the existing <br />house but that they are attempting to benefit the neighbors by relocating it. Musgjerd stated she had <br />hoped there would be a little bit of give and take since they have improved the lot overall. Musgjerd <br />noted they do not have time to redesign the house and that they have spent a lot of money designing a <br />house. <br /> <br />McMillan commented the City Council has to follow the codes whenever possible. <br /> <br />Mrs. Musgjerd stated there is not a big enough buildable area on the lot without some variances. <br /> <br />Rahn noted the Council is agreeable to a 25-foot variance to the setback. <br /> <br />Mrs. Musgjerd commented that basically the existing house will rot because no one will want to purchase <br />it. Musgjerd stated in her view this is not a big house when you compare it with the other homes in the <br />area. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the City will not be able to resolve the issue tonight of people going on private property <br />rather than the fire lane to access the lake and that tonight they are looking at the proposed house and the <br />setbacks. The City Council can either vote on it or table the application to allow them to redesign their <br />plans to comply with the 10-foot setback. McMillan stated they would have two weeks to redesign their <br />plans but that she is not sure what the City can do in two weeks to resolve the fire lane issue. <br /> <br />Rahn commented that would be a police issue. <br /> <br />Sharratt pointed out they are not asking for resolution of the fire lane use at this time. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 10/22/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/08/2012 [Page 12 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.