My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2012 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2012
>
10-22-2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 12:22:12 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:49:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 8, 2012 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 9 of 21 <br /> <br />(8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Sharratt commented he is not sure if the entire Council has walked the fire lane but that it is extremely <br />steep. The water currently travels perpendicular to grade and then starts to turn and eventually comes <br />right off the alley across this property, which has resulted in a washout area. A survey from 20 years ago <br />shows that the washout area was not there and he is not sure how it developed over the years. The <br />washout issue has been brought up to Staff and the applicants are willing to work with the City in an <br />effort to deal with the problem. The fire lane over the years has predominantly been used as a <br />snowmobile path and not many people walk down to the lake using the fire lane. The alleyway is also <br />overgrown with trees. The street is 41 feet above the lake and it is quite a steep walk down the fire lane. <br /> <br />Sharratt noted the neighbor across the street had a concern about constructing a bigger house on this lot. <br />That owner would like this house to be between 8 and10 feet away from the property line. Sharratt stated <br />locating the house eight feet off the property line would be an option and would allow a bigger deck on <br />the other side. The neighbor on the other side of the street raised some concerns that he was going to lose <br />his view of the lake. Sharratt noted that neighbor’s view will actually be widened. <br /> <br />Sharratt stated they have attempted to address all the concerns of the neighbors and the City and that they <br />are proposing to construct a much nicer home than what currently exists. <br /> <br />Franchot asked what the likelihood is that the alley would ever be used for anything other than its current <br />use. <br /> <br />Struve indicated based on its location, the likelihood is that it will not be used for much beyond how it is <br />currently being used. <br /> <br />Franchot stated in his view this is a reasonable request and that there is open land between the two lots <br />and that the effect of being too close to the neighbors is not a real issue. Franchot stated with the <br />cantilevered deck, he does not see any safety issues. <br /> <br />Franchot stated part of the City Council’s role is to assist its citizens in having the best home they can <br />have without it causing harm to the lake or the neighbors. Franchot stated the other concerns raised are <br />simply possibilities and that in his view they do not rise to the level where the application should be <br />denied. <br /> <br />Printup commented it would be easy to allow a deck but questioned where it would stop. Printup stated a <br />similar request could happen to the neighboring property or the property down the road. Printup <br />commented it seems that these situations have come up a number of times in the past and asked whether <br />that would leave the City exposed to future variance requests of a similar nature. <br /> <br />Franchot asked whether a precedent would be created by granting this variance. <br /> <br />Mattick stated each of the applications stands on their own. Future applicants will likely look at variances <br />that the Council has approved and that it is a question that will be asked. <br /> <br />Dennis Walsh, 1354 Rest Point Circle, commended Mike Sharratt for his design given the tough nature of <br />the lot. Walsh stated the City owes it to its residents to allow them to build houses that are saleable and <br />that they should grant some leeway on narrow lots. Walsh stated in his view that shows the residents that <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 10/22/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/08/2012 [Page 9 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.