My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-2012 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2012
>
10-08-2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 12:21:45 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:42:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 24, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br />(4. ROOSTERS - POTENTIAL ANIMAL ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> <br />of code revisions could be to merely prohibit the keeping of roosters anywhere in the City. This would be <br />consistent with the intent of Orono's Rural Residential zoning. In that case, Staff would recommend that <br />the language of Chapter 62, Section 62-9, Animal Limits, be amended to include language that prohibits <br />roosters. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the City's Comprehensive Plan talks about the concept of a rural area that is turning into a <br />rural residential area and addresses the type of action the City should take in the future. "The City is <br />growing in population from a rural agricultural community to a rural residential community. Use of the <br />land for residential purposes is considered primary, with other uses viewed as supporting this use. <br />Present commercial or industrial activity where consistent with residential use and other guiding <br />principles will be protected by ordinance or conditional use permit. It is not the intention to expand or <br />allow all such commercial or industrial activity where it conflicts with the primary residential use and <br />other guiding principles. The continued use of the land for farming and similar purposes will be protected <br />by ordinance or conditional use permit where sufficient acreage allows such use to continue without <br />conflict with expanding residential use." <br /> <br />Gaffron stated one of the charges that the City Council has is to consider whether or not the expansion of <br />residential use, even the low density rural area, has reached a point where it may be time to look at <br />whether or not some of these quasi-agricultural uses are impacting residential use. <br /> <br />Pending the outcome of the noise violation litigation, Staff recommends that no further regulation of <br />chickens or fowl be considered at this time as Staff believes there are no demonstrated issues that cannot <br />be addressed through enforcement of existing ordinances. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan concurred that Orono has changed over the years and is becoming more residential, <br />which could potentially lead to some conflicts. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan opened the meeting for public comment. <br /> <br />Laura Shatzer, 3685 Watertown Road, thanked the City Council and Staff for addressing their complaints <br />about the continuous sound of roosters crowing. Shatzer stated she would like to explain her reasons for <br />why they think the citizens and residents would benefit from prohibiting roosters. A number of other <br />local cities and towns around Orono, such as Shorewood, Minnetonka, Loretto, Delano, Watertown and <br />others, have all banned roosters or placed restrictions on them. <br /> <br />Shatzer stated Mr. Gaffron's August 15th report was very thorough and they are in agreement with a <br />potential amendment prohibiting roosters. Shatzer stated she understands if the Zoning Code or zoning <br />ordinance is amended, existing roosters would be grandfathered and this would have no affect on <br />resolving their current problem that they are having with their neighbor's roosters. <br /> <br />Shatzer indicated they have tried for over a year to work out a peaceful resolution with their neighbor to <br />the roosters crowing. The crowing began in the spring of 2011 and they were very patient and friendly in <br />their contacts with the neighbor regarding the roosters. Shatzer stated getting along with their neighbors <br />is very important to them and that they are under the belief that you should consider your neighbors in all <br />that you do and be respectful of their space and right to quiet enjoyment of their property. All <br />neighborhoods have periodic sounds, but it is the daily, continuous bombardment of loud, unpleasant <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 10/08/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/24/2012 [Page 6 of 12]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.