Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 10, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 21 of 26 <br /> <br />(12. CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan stated when you are talking about people’s jobs and livelihoods, test driving is not really the <br />best situation. <br /> <br />Lein stated after three years the chief of police will know whether this is working out and Orono would <br />then have the option to pull out of the contract. Lein stated he understands there are jobs involved but <br />there is also the Orono community that has to be thought about. <br /> <br />Farniok stated it was a tough decision. Since Mound is disbanding their police department, they wanted a <br />longer contract. Mound understands their police department will not be coming back because of the <br />startup costs. Farniok noted Mound wanted a longer contract than five years and had requested either a <br />seven or eight year contract. <br /> <br />Franchot stated this is Orono’s proposal to Mound and that Staff and the Police Department have looked <br />at everything that Mr. Lien has raised. Franchot noted the contract guarantees the revenue and Orono <br />retains control over the costs. <br /> <br />Lein stated a lot of his questions are based on public perception and that some of it is coming from <br />Mound. <br /> <br />Franchot commented he did attend the Mound City Council meeting and that Mound has spent a lot of <br />time thinking about this proposal as has Orono. Franchot stated in his view the questions are valid but <br />that the City Council and Police Chief have answered them. Franchot stated he can assure Mr. Lein that <br />there was no rush to judgment. While it was done expeditiously, it was not a rush judgment and it was <br />not a foregone conclusion. Franchot stated this contract has been looked at almost entirely from Orono's <br />perspective. <br /> <br />Printup stated in his view that is exactly why the vote tonight should be postponed for a couple of weeks <br />to allow the public to comment on it. It is the public's view that this is already a done deal. <br /> <br />Franchot noted this item was published beforehand. <br /> <br />Printup stated it has not been publicized in the same way it was publicized in Mound. <br /> <br />McMillan noted a motion has been made to table this item to the September 24th meeting. <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes 1, Nays 4, Bremer, McMillan, Rahn, and Franchot opposed. <br /> <br />Rahn stated he would like separate motions on the contract and the organizational chart. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the police chief is comfortable with that option. <br /> <br />Farniok stated they are looking at an internal candidate for the deputy chief position but that they need to <br />start assigning tasks in the near future. Farniok indicated a two week delay could be managed but a four <br />week delay would be difficult. <br /> <br />Rahn stated in his view it would be good to table the other items for two weeks. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 09/24/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/10/2012 <br />[Page 21 of 26]