Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 27, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 5 of 11 <br /> <br />6. #12-3569 MILLS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, ON BEHALF OF JASON WILSEY, 990 <br />NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 6163 <br /> <br />Chris Janssen, Mills Construction, and Jason Wilsey, Applicant, were present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the owner would like to construct a guest apartment within the proposed home to function as <br />a private space for visiting family. Because the guest apartment is proposed to have its own separate <br />exterior door, a conditional use permit is required. <br /> <br />The non-rental guest apartment provisions in the zoning code allow for two types of guest apartments: an <br />apartment with a door to the outside and an apartment without a door to the outside. According to the <br />zoning code, a guest apartment must be physically connected to the home and access to the apartment in <br />all cases must be primarily through the principal structure and not via a separate front door. If an <br />additional door is provided which accesses directly to the outside of the home, a conditional use permit is <br />required. <br /> <br />Curtis stated there will be a door as shown connecting the guest apartment to the principal structure <br />through the office area. Staff is recommending the service door from the garage be eliminated for the <br />guest apartment. The applicant expressed a concern that elimination of that door would cut off access <br />from the guest apartment to the storm cellar in the garage. <br /> <br />On August 20, 2012, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed guest apartment conforms to <br />the conditional use permitting parameters outlined within City code Section 78-916 and voted 7 to 0 to <br />recommend approval consistent with Staff's recommendation, which included removal of the service <br />door. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the CUP for the guest apartment subject to the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. The service door between the garage and the guest apartment must be completely eliminated; <br /> <br />2. The guest apartment shall be utilized solely for non-paying guests or domestic employees; <br /> <br />3. The guest apartment shall not be addressed separately from the principal residence; and <br /> <br />4. The guest apartment shall not have separate utilities. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she spoke with the building inspector and he indicated that there is no building code that <br />requires that service door. Staff has determined there is adequate access from the garage into the <br />principal primary residence and that the guest apartment can access the basement through the principal <br />residence. <br /> <br />Franchot asked why the service door should be eliminated. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the purpose of the code is to prohibit the creation of a duplex. It is easy for someone to cut a <br />door through a wall and it is also easy to construct a wall separating the two garage sections. The concern <br />is that this is maintained as a single-family dwelling. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/10/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/27/2012 <br />[Page 5 of 11]