My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2012 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2012
>
09-10-2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 12:20:48 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:23:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
482
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 27, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 11 <br /> <br />(3. POLICE SERVICE PROPOPSAL TO MOUND, Continued) <br /> <br />Farniok confirmed that it is normal to respond to an emergency in another zone. Prior to creating zones, <br />the patrol car couldn’t leave the Spring Park area to respond to an outside call. Zones allow the closest <br />patrol car to respond, even if the call is across the boundary. Then another officer will go and cover the <br />area the first officer left. <br /> <br />Bremer noted the other contract cities are aware of this proposal and that the Police Commission has <br />reviewed this proposal thoroughly. Bremer stated the City needs to be aware of all of the advantages and <br />disadvantages of the proposal since this is a 10-year contract. A longer contract is to Orono's advantage <br />but that everyone needs to understand the City of Orono will be bound for ten years and that there likely <br />are unknowns that have not been considered through this process. <br /> <br />Bremer noted Orono no longer has an agreement with Spring Park where Orono provides one designated <br />patrol officer. Bremer stated the contract cities have been great to work with and that there is a police <br />commission meeting scheduled for the first week in September. <br /> <br />Farniok stated as it relates to calls for service, Mound had 12,193 and Orono had 13,933. The response <br />time for Mound is 4.12 minutes and Orono is 5.74 minutes. Farniok stated in his opinion these are good <br />response times given the layout of the roads and geographic areas. The Police Department monitors these <br />times carefully and they have been consistent for the past three or four years. <br /> <br />Franchot noted the Mound City Council will be voting on the contract tomorrow tonight. <br /> <br />Printup asked how the Police Department and the City’s PERA contribution will be affected by the <br />addition of the 10 officers. <br /> <br />Olson stated PERA is paid as a percentage of the employee wage. If there are more employees and more <br />wages, PERA would increase, but that has been factored into the pro forma budget that was discussed <br />earlier. <br /> <br />Printup asked where citation revenues go in the budget. <br /> <br />Farniok indicated the ticket revenue would go to the city that issued the ticket. <br /> <br />Printup asked whether it would go into the General Fund or the Police Department Fund. <br /> <br />Farniok stated they would go into the General Fund. <br /> <br />Bremer noted Orono budgets for fine revenue as much as possible based on past history. <br /> <br />McMillan noted there is a provision in the contract for dispute resolution that will hopefully make the <br />process go smoothly in the event of a disagreement. McMillan noted both cities are committed to the <br />contract and that it will benefit both communities. <br /> <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/10/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/27/2012 <br />[Page 3 of 11]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.