Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 25, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />    Page 18 of 29   <br />(6. #13-3631 LANDSOURCE, LLC (TODD HOLMERS), 3700 NORTHERN AVENUE, <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT – RESOLUTION NO. 6345, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan noted once the preliminary plat is approved, not much can be changed at the time of final plat. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the conservation easement is something that can be adjusted and that the terms of the <br />easement are something the City Council does have authority to review at the time of final plat. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the City has always done wetland conservation easements, which is part of the process of <br />protecting the water quality and wetlands. McMillan indicated she does have a concern with subdivisions <br />where the City has to place a number of other easements or restrictions on the property. McMillan stated <br />having to place a lot of other restrictions on the property harkens back to her initial concern with the <br />amount of lots being proposed for this site. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the resolution states that Lots 3 and 4 contain less than one-half acre of contiguous dry <br />buildable and that it might only be Lot 4. McMillan stated in her view Lot 4 is not a good building site <br />and for that reason she will not vote for the resolution. McMillan stated Lots 3 and 4 should be combined <br />into one lot and that having two building envelopes will put more pressure on the adjacent lots. McMillan <br />stated in her view five lots should be the absolute maximum on this site. <br /> <br />Levang requested Staff display the layout of the site. Levang noted there is only a 10-foot back yard for <br />Lot 4. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated Exhibit D depicts the six narrow lots going from front to back and also shows the location <br />of the conservation easement and the building envelopes. <br /> <br />Levang asked whether the wetland buffer would be 40 or 50 feet. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the wetland buffer would be 40 feet and the additional setback is 10 feet, for a total of <br />50 feet. Gaffron noted the house on Lot 4 cannot be built exactly the way it is depicted. In addition, the <br />developer is showing a 35-foot front setback which can actually be reduced to 30 feet, so the development <br />can be moved further south. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated he is in agreement that Lot 4 has no flexibility whatsoever and that the property owner <br />will have a minimal backyard of no more than 10, 15 feet from the back of the house. Gaffron indicated <br />the PRD process allows this type of density to happen and in this case, due to the wetlands, there are <br />some lots that are restricted, inflexible, and do not allow much leeway. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is concerned about a back yard that is only 10 to 15 feet. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that is a choice of the developer and the buyer. <br /> <br />Levang asked if Staff has any idea about the size of the houses or the cost of the homes. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated there have been no depictions of the houses submitted and that the generic shapes <br />shown on the layout will likely change. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 12/09/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/25/2013 <br />[Page 18 of 29]