My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
11-25-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:48:09 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:00:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
553
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 5 of 36 <br />(7. #13-3631 LANDSOURCE, LLC (TODD HOLMERS), 3700 NORTHERN AVENUE, <br />SUBDIVISION – PRELIMINARY PLAT – PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />4. Approval should be subject to the standard platting requirements including park dedication, <br /> stormwater trunk fees, granting of appropriate easements, etc., to be defined and enumerated <br /> in a resolution for preliminary plat approval. <br /> <br />5. Council should advise Staff and applicant of any concerns regarding any aspects of the proposal <br /> that need to be further addressed. <br /> <br />Bremer noted the Planning Commission’s preference was Option 1 and asked whether that was in part <br />directed by the applicant. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that would be a fair statement. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how many lots could be developed if it was constructed to code. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion, if all the codes were complied with, it would likely result in five lots and it <br />would go back to the proposal that has the back lots where they would need to have one and a half acres. <br />Two of the other lots would have half an acre of dry buildable and one lot would have less than that. <br />Gaffron indicated the wetland in the center of the property makes it difficult to do a standard plat and the <br />applicant is pretty much tied to using the existing road and utilities. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view it sounds like four would fit in more comfortably than five. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it would be difficult to get five lots without having back lots. <br /> <br />Printup asked if outlots are taxed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated typically the assessor will take the value of the common area and split it among each of the <br />building sites. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the outlots would be managed by a homeowners association. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated they would be and that the City would need to ensure that any common areas receive <br />the appropriate classification. <br /> <br />Levang asked what would happen if the outlot is removed from the calculation and the Council requires <br />half-acre lots that are 100 feet in width. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted Page 2 of the October 17 memo shows the lot acreages. Gaffron stated the total dry <br />buildable land would be just over two acres of dry land, within the outlot there would be two acres, and <br />the remaining would be wetland. <br /> <br />Levang stated per the existing zoning, 100-foot wide lots and one-half acre dry contiguous land would be <br />required. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 11/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/12/2013 <br />[Page 5 of 36]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.