My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
11-25-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:48:09 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:00:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
553
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 7 of 36 <br />(7. #13-3631 LANDSOURCE, LLC (TODD HOLMERS), 3700 NORTHERN AVENUE, <br />SUBDIVISION – PRELIMINARY PLAT – PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Stickney stated Mark Gronberg created the plan. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there would need to be a homeowners association for the outlot. <br /> <br />Levang stated to her understanding it is an option and that it could either be set up that each individual <br />owner owns a portion of it or it could be a common area. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated there will be maintenance issues with the outlot, and that without a homeowners <br />association of some sort, there will be a question about ownership. Gaffron stated he does not see a <br />simple way to have the outlot without it being owned by the group as a whole. <br /> <br />Printup asked if Staff knows how many homeowners associations there are in the City. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City does not keep track of individual homeowner associations but that they range from <br />formal to informal. Gaffron indicated there are probably around 60 homeowners associations and that <br />they correlate with the private roads. <br /> <br />Levang asked how the trail was developed. <br /> <br />Stickney stated that came about as a result of the meeting and his prior development experience. <br /> <br />Levang stated she is not in favor of the trail. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in order for some of the lots to gain access to the back part of their property, it would be <br />necessary for there to be a path. Gaffron stated it is likely the trail would need to be within the buffer, <br />which would likely not be approved by the Watershed District. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she has a difficult time creating more than four lots and that one of the purposes of <br />cluster development is to preserve open spaces. McMillan stated the issue with clustering on this lot is <br />that the southern portion of the site is maxed out. <br /> <br />Stickney commented they could also construct a road back there which would not be ideal. <br /> <br />Levang noted this is a piece of land that has not been developed previously. <br /> <br />Stickney stated they are not proposing anything out of the ordinary as it relates to lot sizes. <br /> <br />McMillan stated a lot of the lots around Lake Minnetonka were platted prior to the adoption of many of <br />the City’s regulations. McMillan stated this is an opportunity to develop this piece of land to code and <br />that there has to be some very strong reasons to cluster and add more density to this area. McMillan <br />noted the City did approve cluster development at Creekside due to the topography. McMillan stated <br />while this property does have a wetland, development is not overly difficult as it relates to the <br />topography. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 11/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/12/2013 <br />[Page 7 of 36]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.