Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 28, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 6 of 14   <br />(5. #13-3629 RYAN AND STACY ALNESS, 1169 NORTH ARM DRIVE, SUBDIVISION – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 6335, Continued) <br /> <br />Struve indicated the work involved would be removing the controls off of the pole and relocating them <br />and then some internal work on the lift station would also need to be completed. The actual manhole will <br />not be relocated. The improvements that were outlined to Mr. and Mrs. Alness were replacing the top <br />access panel to make it a drivable access point along with a few other minor items. The lift station itself <br />will not be moved but a drivable hatch will be installed. Struve stated he is not sure whether that will <br />solve the access issues completely but that it is a start. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what other costs might be associated with this project. <br /> <br />Struve stated the drivable rated hatches are pretty standard and it just needs to be measured and then <br />ordered. <br /> <br />McMillan asked when the controls would be moved. <br /> <br />Struve stated it is in the CIP for 2014 but that it is not set in stone. <br /> <br />Bremer noted she was not in attendance at the last City Council meeting but that she would be interested <br />in knowing whether any of the Council Members would change their opinion or if this has alleviated their <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Levang stated the Council was dealing with the Special Lot Combination and that access was not really <br />discussed since it was a separate issue. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her opinion the City Council needs to go forward with the denial resolution tonight <br />and that it is up to the applicant to pursue the access issue. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the new application would be a request to terminate the Special Lot Agreement but it <br />would be slightly different given the access being resolved. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it comes down to the legal language contained in the Special Lot Agreement and that <br />under the subdivision rules it requires a conforming lot. McMillan stated the City cannot make any <br />guarantees that the request will be approved. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the issue with the lot size will remain but that the access issue would make it a different <br />application. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Anderson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6335, a Resolution Denying a <br />Request to Extinguish a Special Lot Combination and Denying a Subdivision of the property <br />located at 1169 North Arm Drive. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0, Printup and Bremer Abstained. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - *11/12/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/28/2013 <br />[Page 6 of 14]