My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-2012 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2012
>
06-25-2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:18 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 2:49:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 11, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br /> <br />(7. #12-3551 CARL TSENG AND KIM YUEH CHAUN, 1505 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />1. Approval of the lot area and width variances; <br /> <br />2. Approval of 0-75 and 75-250 foot hardcover variances; <br /> <br />3. Approval of the requested side setback variances, subject to implementation of a final grading <br /> and drainage plan acceptable to the City Engineer; <br /> <br />4. Approval of lake setback and street setback variances as proposed; <br /> <br />5. Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as proposed; <br /> <br />6. Approval of a variance to allow structure within the defined bluff impact zone subject to <br /> implementation of final grading and drainage plans for the site. Any retaining walls four feet in <br /> height or greater will require submittal of plans designed by a structural engineer; <br /> <br />7. Approval of a CUP and variance for grading/excavation/fill within the 0-75 foot zone; <br /> <br />8. The applicant shall provide for City council approval a proposed tree replacement plan for the <br /> two large oaks being lost. The Planning Commission recommended that a total of four <br /> replacement trees be shown with a minimum combined diameter of 10 inches of applicant’s <br /> property and one 2-inch minimum diameter tree on the neighboring property. The applicant shall <br /> take all necessary measures to ensure the survivability of all other mature trees within the 0-75 <br /> foot protected area. <br /> <br />9. The applicant is advised of street parking limitations during the construction process. <br /> <br />10. Approval is subject to all recommendations of the City Consulting Engineer in his letter dated <br /> May 17, 2012. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted that the neighborhood residents have had considerable input into this application and would <br />prefer the existing house be replaced. <br /> <br />Tom Budznski, Builder, stated Staff has covered the majority of the items and that the neighbors have <br />provided comment on the application, which has been taken into consideration. Budznski stated the large <br />mature tree in the front will not survive the construction since the roots have grown under the existing <br />house. <br /> <br />Franchot asked if the draft resolution is acceptable to the applicant. <br /> <br />Budzynski indicated it is. <br /> <br />McMillan opened the public hearing at 8:26 p.m. <br /> <br />Stavig indicated he is in favor of the proposal and that the only concern he has is the loss of trees and that <br />he hopes there is a plan for replacement of those trees. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 06/25/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 06/11/12 [Page 12 of 17]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.