My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
08-26-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:42:04 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 2:22:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 12, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 25 of 37 <br />(10. #13-3614 FRED JOHNSON ON BEHALF OF PATRICIA L. PFEFFER, 1565 ORCHARD <br />BEACH PLACE – VARIANCES, Continued) <br /> <br />According to the City’s zoning book, Page 78-1134, variances could be granted if a determination is made <br />that the failure to grant the variance will result in exceptional hardship to the applicant. The land was <br />purchased 33 years ago for $150,000. Larson commented this is a valuable piece of ground and has 83 <br />feet of south facing lakeshore, is wooded and private. <br /> <br />Larson indicated when he came to the City to ask about a sewer stub, he was told there was not one. The <br />tax assessor was also told there is no sewer stub. A city official by the name of Thomas Jacobs in 1981 <br />signed a demolition order and put it in writing that there was no sewer stub. Larson stated the City has <br />misrepresented to everybody that there is no sewer stub there. Larson indicated Hennepin County has the <br />assessment records showing where the land was charged for lateral sewer. <br /> <br />Larson stated there are also errors in the City’s documents. The 1978 resolution states under Item 2 that <br />the property is deficient and consists of 8,000 square feet. Larson indicated the property actually consists <br />of 9,600 square feet. There is also a 19-foot boulevard in the area and a portion of that could be vacated <br />to allow this property to get to the required 10,000 square feet. Larson indicated he has the original 1880 <br />plat. <br /> <br />Larson stated the 1978 resolution also states this lot has 80 feet of lakeshore. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the resolution is Exhibit H of the Planning Commission packet. <br /> <br />Larson stated Items A and B in the resolution are incorrect. The state statute refers to errors made in a <br />resolution. Item D is also in error. Larson commented half of the stuff in the resolution is bogus and that <br />Item 5 is in error. Larson indicated he has a survey with elevations showing that the property is on a hill <br />and that the property does not flood. <br /> <br />McMillan stated they could have mistakenly called it flooding when it is actually runoff. <br /> <br />Larson stated Item 7A relates to traffic congestion. Since this will be a two-bedroom house, very little <br />traffic will be generated. Larson indicated the surface water drainage problems have been addressed by <br />their engineer. Water pollution into Lake Minnetonka is impossible and the ground will be protected <br />during construction and the house will be professionally built. Larson indicated they will put a little pond <br />down there if necessary. <br /> <br />Larson stated as it relates to Item E, diminishing the values of surrounding properties, this development <br />will not diminish the value of the surrounding properties and will not create any parking problems. <br /> <br />Larson stated the1880 plat shows six 50-foot lots plus another lot that is next to the one they are <br />proposing to develop. <br /> <br />McMillan noted those lots do not exist today. <br /> <br />Larson stated the intent of the plat was to have these small lots. There is a lot that contains both a house <br />and a guest cottage on it that is clearly marked park. Larson commented there is also another lot that was <br />platted as a common area and not laid out as a buildable lot. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 08/26/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/12/2013 [Page 25 of 37]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.