Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, March 26, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />(3. #12-3542 CITY OF ORONO, CODE AMENDMENT FOR LOTS OF RECORD IN <br />SHORELAND AREAS, Continued) <br /> <br />The 2009 Statute revisions require that cities allow property owners to build on such lots when they meet <br />certain minimum criteria. These minimum criteria are generally not consistent with Orono's minimum <br />standards and would allow building on lots which would not be considered buildable without substantial <br />variances under Orono code. The City no longer has the option of denying buildability of such lots when <br />they meet the minimum criteria established by the new statute. The primary intent of the proposed <br />ordinance is to make Orono Code consistent with state law. An example of this is the application for a <br />development on Maple Place. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance at a public hearing held on February 21st and <br />voted 6-0 to recommend approval. There were no comments from the public. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the ordinance and summary ordinance attached to the Staff memo. <br />Gaffron noted there are some small lots that would not be buildable with the statute in place. Gaffron <br />indicated he is not concerned about the impact on Big Island but that he does have a concern with small <br />lots located in Navarre. <br /> <br />McMillan asked about the list of record lots and if any are located on the mainland. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the list is only for the RS District and includes Big Island and Deering Island <br />properties, adding that the record lots were created specifically for Big Island back in 1983 and that the <br />list has not been updated since that time. <br /> <br />McMillan noted Item 3 on Page 3 states, in part, that the total amount of hardcover that may be placed, <br />located or constructed in areas where hardcover is not prohibited shall not exceed 25 percent of the entire <br />lot. McMillan asked if the entire lot area is included in that calculation. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it is. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated it relates solely to the need for a lot area variance. If you wanted to construct in the <br />75-250 foot zone, you would still be constrained to 25 percent hardcover in that zone and you would not <br />get to apply the 25 percent used for the entire lot as an exemption for the lot area variance. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that may clarify what was discussed during the work session earlier this evening. Gaffron <br />noted there was a concern raised during the work session that the City would not have the ability to deny <br />a variance if the property was more than 25 percent hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone. This language <br />clarifies that the City would have the ability to approve or deny a hardcover variance. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the idea behind the legislation was that as lakeshore valuation increased, higher density <br />becomes more desirable. People felt that if you have three lots, you should be allowed to construct on all <br />three lots; whereas before the legislation was adopted, they would have had to combine those lots to reach <br />the two acre minimum. <br /> <br />Rahn moved, Printup seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 92, THIRD SERIES, an Ordinance <br />Amending Chapter 78 of the Orono City Code Regarding Lots of Record in Shoreland Areas, and <br />to adopt the Summary Ordinance for publication. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/09/2012 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/26/2012[Page 3 of 7]