My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
07-22-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2015 2:11:22 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 2:07:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 8, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 13 <br />5. #13-3604 ESKUCHE ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF NEIL AND BARBARA <br />GOODWIN, 2975 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES – PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to construct a new residence on the property and are requesting <br />an average lakeshore setback variance to construct the house as proposed. Also being requested is a <br />conditional use permit to conduct land alterations within 75 feet of the lake for redesigned stairs, landings <br />and smaller retaining walls. <br /> <br />At the time of the Planning Commission meeting, the applicants plan exceeded both hardcover and <br />structural coverage limitations. Since that time the applicants have revised their plan so that both <br />hardcover and structural coverage levels are met. <br /> <br /> <br />The average lakeshore setback line is determined by the location of the homes on the two neighboring <br />lakeshore lots. The property immediately to the south of the applicants’ property consists solely of a <br />tennis court and a tall perimeter fence or wall which is situated on or over the applicants’ property line. <br />The same owner also owns the tennis court lot. <br /> <br />The applicants are requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to encroach up to 21 feet into the <br />setback with portions of the new home. Even with the encroachment, the applicants’ proposed plan <br />appears to improve the views of the lake for the neighbor to the north at 2967 Casco Point Road. Due to <br />the separation between the two homes and the location of the tennis court, the views of the lake from <br />2987 Casco Point Road to the south do not appear to be adversely impacted by the proposed <br />encroachment. <br /> <br />At the June 17 Planning Commission meeting, there were a number of neighbors who spoke about the <br />application and specifically discussed storm water issues on Casco Point Road. The applicants’ property <br />exists on a little point on Casco Point Road. Curtis stated approximately two weeks ago she and the City <br />Engineer and Staff visited the site, along with a representative of the applicant, and the City Engineer <br />provided some direction regarding grading and drainage. His comments are included in the City <br />Council’s packet. <br /> <br />Curtis noted that the Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the variances as <br />requested contingent upon City Engineer approval of the grading plan and that all storm water and <br />drainage issues are resolved prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Planning Commission further <br />recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the <br />garage to break up the massing effects. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and the average lakeshore setback variance <br />consistent with the Planning Commission’s recommendations. Tonight the Council should open the <br />public hearing and take comments from the applicant and the public and then direct Staff to draft a <br />resolution reflecting the Council’s decision. <br /> <br />Bremer noted she attended the Planning Commission meeting and that the Planning Commission made <br />some good recommendations for the project. <br /> <br />Printup asked if any additional public comment has been received since the Planning Commission <br />meeting. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 07/22/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/08/2013 <br />[Page 2 of 13]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.