My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
06-24-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:31:24 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 1:58:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, June 10, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 2 of 32 <br />(4. 2012 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT, Continued) <br /> <br />Hoffman stated the first graph depicts the general fund - unreserved/unassigned fund balance for the past <br />four years. The general fund did decrease by approximately $400,000 in 2012, which was a planned <br />decrease by the City Council. The second graph depicts the revenue deposited into the general fund over <br />the same period of time and reflects approximately a $100,000 decrease in licenses and permits. Hoffman <br />noted the City’s residents did experience some storm damage in 2011 which accounted for the higher <br />licenses and permit fees. Overall the general fund revenues remained consistent with the prior years. <br /> <br />The third graph reflects the expenditures out of the general fund. Public safety decreased by <br />approximately $100,000 but otherwise it was very similar to 2011. <br /> <br />Overall there was a decrease in total fund balance, which was largely due to a decrease in the pavement <br />management fund as a result of some projects undertaken by the City in 2012. As it relates to other <br />governmental funds not included in the general fund, total revenue was approximately $1.5 million, <br />which was basically the same as 2011. <br /> <br />Hoffman noted the other fund expenditures for 2012 were $3.3 million as compared to $3.4 million in <br />2011. The largest increase in capital outlay expenditures mainly related to the Orono Orchard Road <br />project and the pavement management fund. This was offset by a significant decrease in debt service <br />expenditures. Overall the expenditures were very similar to prior years. <br /> <br />As it relates to the enterprise funds, overall there was not a significant change between 2011 and 2012. <br />Operating income in the water fund did increase slightly from 2011, stormwater remained consistent, and <br />the sewer fund increased slightly. The main increase for the water fund was a slight increase in user rates <br />and usage. <br /> <br />Hoffman stated as it relates to the graph entitled government-wide financial data, this incorporates all of <br />the other graphs into one graph. The cash line did decrease quite a bit from the prior year but the chart <br />does not include non-spendable assets, such as infrastructure. Cash reserves decreased but the City’s <br />capital assets increased and were mainly related to some road projects. <br /> <br />Projection of future debt service envisions no additional debt service and is projected to decrease in each <br />of the next five years assuming no new debt is taken out. <br /> <br />The tax rate comparison according to the League of Minnesota Cities shows that the City of Orono is <br />down around 15 percent, which is the lowest among neighboring communities as well as being <br />significantly lower than the statewide city average. Orono is included in Region 11 and the graph shows <br />that Orono is quite low compared to a number of similarly sized cities. <br /> <br />Hoogeveen stated GASB 62 and 63 affected the terminology used in the government-wide and <br />proprietary fund statements but will have no financial impact on the City. GASB 68 will become <br />effective in 2015 and will require the City to report a net pension liability for their allocation of the state- <br />administered pension plans. Hoogeveen noted this requirement is not as significant for a city as it is for a <br />school district since the city only has PERA. Hoogeveen commented that funding of pensions in <br />Minnesota is better than other states. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda 06/24/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 06/10/2013 [Page 2 of 32]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.