Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 13, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />   Page 5 of 26   <br />(6a. #13-3599 HOMETIME VIDEO PUBLISHING (DEAN JOHNSON), 80 CREEK RIDGE <br />PASS – ATF VARIANCE – RESOLUTION NO. 6227, Continued) <br /> <br />Curtis displayed the plat map for the two properties. Curtis stated initially the builder presented these <br />plans for that property, but due to the wetland setbacks and other constraints of the lot, it was difficult to <br />construct on that lot with those proposed plans. <br /> <br />Johnson noted there is also a creek that runs through the lot and a 45-foot leeway from the creek and a 20- <br />foot setback from the creek. After 2005, the City passed an additional 20-foot buffer, which has <br />diminished the ability to construct on the lot. Johnson indicated they then decided to construct on this lot <br />but that they will likely need a variance to construct on the adjacent lot. <br /> <br />Gaffron pointed out the variance that would be needed for the adjacent lot would not relate to the <br />application before it tonight. The Planned Residential Development for this site was approved in 2005. <br />The original property consisted of 20 acres, with 14 acres being dry buildable. The previous developers <br />were allowed to create a subdivision that has lots with buildable lots of approximately one acre for a total <br />of seven lots. The homes were clustered together to preserve the wetland and some of the dry buildable <br />land. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated there were a number of reasons why these lots were created relatively small for the <br />two-acre zone but noted the Council still required a 60-foot setback between the houses to maintain the <br />rural character of the neighborhood. Gaffron stated this anomaly may affect it slightly but the impact <br />should not be significant. <br /> <br />Johnson concurred that the impact will be minimal since the massing of the house will be on the other <br />side. <br /> <br />Levang asked how many feet will be between the two houses. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the variance would allow a 24-foot setback on this lot. <br /> <br />Levang noted there would be an impact by pivoting the house. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if the Council wanted to retain the 60-foot setback between the buildings, there would have <br />to be some modifications made to the adjacent lot. Gaffron noted they do not have a design yet for the <br />adjacent property but that there are a number of designs that could be constructed within the building <br />envelop but the house may not fit in with the rest of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Johnson stated due to the price range of the homes, it would be difficult to sell if the size of the home is <br />reduced. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how big this house is. <br /> <br />Johnson indicated it is 3,400 square feet for the top two floors. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what the footprint is. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/28/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/13/2013 <br />[Page 5 of 26]