Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 13, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />   Page 15 of 26   <br /> (8. #13-3596 CITY OF ORONO, ZONING STUDY – ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated there is a list of allowed uses within the 0-75 foot zone and that can be added. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted that would be contained in a different section of the code than what is being discussed <br />tonight. <br /> <br />McMillan commented she likes the current height restriction for flag poles, especially in the residential <br />zones. <br /> <br />Anderson commented location and height are both important. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view flag poles should stay out of the side setbacks. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she recalls a house design on Tonkawa that wanted a cupola and the City put a height <br />restriction on it. Even though it was not going to be an observation room or tower, the Planning <br />Commission wrestled with granting the variance. McMillan stated she likes how the Planning <br />Commission recommended it be divided up between architectural features on an existing building and a <br />free-standing building. McMillan stated you do not want a structure towering over the neighbor’s lot and <br />that there is something to the use, which is where conditional use permits come into play rather than <br />granting an automatic 50 percent increase in height. <br /> <br />Levang asked where trash enclosures are included. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated they are possibly included with compost. <br /> <br />Levang asked what the rationale was for including it in that section. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated they do not appear to be listed but they would be considered customary and incidental. <br />Gaffron stated a trash enclosure could be a number of different things. The City does not currently have <br />an ordinance that prevents someone from having their garbage can sitting in front of their house. <br /> <br />Bremer stated given the size of the new recycling containers, there are some people who would prefer to <br />keep the container closer to the road. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated he will give some more thought to trash containers. <br /> <br />Mattick pointed out a trash enclosure that is connected to the house is not really an accessory structure. <br /> <br />Levang noted Page 2, Item No. 13, allows one roadside stand offering for sale… <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that has been part of City Code for a number of years and that by state law the City has to <br />allow residents to sell produce from their property. Gaffron noted 40 years ago this was more of a farm <br />community and there were a number of people who wanted to have a stand next to the road. The City <br />required the stand be located 30 feet back from the public right-of-way. Gaffron indicated the standards <br />are questionable and it is up to the City Council on how they want to deal with it. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/28/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/13/2013 <br />[Page 15 of 26]