My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
05-28-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:30:20 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 1:47:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 13, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 26 <br />(8. #13-3596 CITY OF ORONO, ZONING STUDY – ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Bremer noted concrete could also be removed and then the structure is no longer permanent. Bremer <br />stated she would prefer setbacks and the impact that the proposed use could have on the neighbors. <br /> <br />Gaffron suggested the Council discuss setbacks and the use that the structure would be for and the activity <br />that surrounds it. <br /> <br />Bremer noted there is nothing that prevents someone from standing at their lot line. Bremer stated in her <br />view the neighbor issues come from activities that are near the property line that are more permanent. <br /> <br />McMillan stated another option would be to keep the setbacks free of accessory uses. <br /> <br />Mattick commented it would be similar to the City’s regulations regarding the 0-75 foot setback. <br /> <br />Printup asked if that would cover wood piles to trampolines and flag poles. Printup commented the <br />Council may appear to be unpatriotic if someone would like to put up a flag pole and the Council does not <br />allow it. <br /> <br />Bremer noted a number of people have wood piles alongside of their garage. <br /> <br />McMillan stated that option would also allow you to protect side setbacks. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted some of the items might not appear in the non-encroachment section. Gaffron noted if they <br />appear in the non-encroachment section that means they are okay in a specific yard. Gaffron stated they <br />could explore and possibly amend the non-encroachment section by removing certain things that should <br />meet a setback. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what would happen if someone wanted to install an air conditioning unit in the setback. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated that would be a non-encroachment. The City has addressed some of those items by <br />requiring a 5-foot setback from the property line. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if diesel generators are included. <br /> <br />Mattick noted air-conditioning units are called out and that a diesel generator would be considered a <br />stand-alone structure. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Pages 35 sand 36 list all of the non-encroachments. Item 1 covers things that are <br />attached to the house or parts of the house. Item two covers name plate signs and lights for illumination <br />and will require a 5-foot separation from the front lot line. Item 3 covers terraces, steps, uncovered <br />porches and stoops. The City typically does get people that want to construct some sort of platform. The <br />code has allowed those as close as two feet to a lot line in any yard as long as they meet hardcover <br />requirements. Staff has added window wells that do not extend more than five feet from the building. <br />Gaffron indicated sidewalks, driveways and parking are things that you can have essentially in any yard. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/28/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/13/2013 <br />[Page 12 of 26]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.