My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
05-13-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:29:50 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 1:40:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 22, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 14 of 18 <br />(7. #13-3600 - ESKUCHE ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF KATHRYN KALLAS, 3048 NORTH <br />SHORE DRIVE – VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Continued) <br /> <br />Aerial photos show the existing tree stand between the Swenson home and the proposed home in the area <br />where the proposed home will encroach into the average lakeshore setback. Moving the proposed home <br />to the average lakeshore setback line, or even 15 feet closer to the average lakeshore setback line, puts the <br />homes more in line with each other and results in a loss of open space between the three hoes, pushes the <br />proposed home’s lake yard directly adjacent to the Guillaumes’ garage area, and results in minimal gain <br />for the Guillaumes’ view. <br /> <br />Peter Eskuche stated he would like to mention that at the time of the Planning Commission meeting, there <br />were probably not enough visuals available to better illustrate the situation and that he might have failed <br />to communicate the situation sufficiently enough. Eskuche indicated this project is similar to a project at <br />3350 Fox Street that he received approval for approximately two months ago. In this situation, the house <br />has two conditions of water frontage and is therefore positioned well down the lot at a bigger distance <br />from the lakeshore, which, when you average the house on the other side, puts a pretty severe line across <br />for the average lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission documentation did not illustrate that clearly <br />and that might be why they did not fully support the application. <br /> <br />McMillan noted she attended the Planning Commission meeting and that she agrees with the <br />recommendation of Staff. McMillan stated in her view there is a practical difficulty and on this <br />application the Planning Commission also did not have the comments of the neighbors, which would have <br />been helpful. <br /> <br />Eskuche stated the feedback from the neighbors was that they preferred it to be closer to the lake or in the <br />same location since it would actually block their views into the open space area if the house was moved <br />further back. <br /> <br />McMillan commented the average lakeshore setback line in this case is at a weird angle which makes it <br />difficult to work with. <br /> <br />Anderson stated the spirit and intent of the average lakeshore setback line is well intended, and in this <br />case the applicant is protecting the views of both of the neighbors. Anderson indicated she read the <br />minutes from the Planning Commission meeting and that it was a difficult decision. Anderson stated in <br />her view a practical difficulty does exist when you look at the proximity of the neighbors’ homes. <br /> <br />McMillan noted both neighbors benefit from this proposal and if the house is pulled back too far, it would <br />impact them more. McMillan stated in her view this is a good compromise. <br /> <br />Printup stated if the applicant, Mr. Eskuche’s home were remodeled in its current position, the neighbors <br />would really not gain anything. After reviewing the documentation, Printup indicated he ultimately came <br />to the conclusion that it is an appropriate fit. <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Printup seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for Application <br />#13-3600 - Eskuche Associates on behalf of Kathryn Kallas, 3048 North Shore Drive, granting of a <br />variance and conditional use permit. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 05/13/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/22/2013 [Page 14 of 18]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.