Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 8, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />   Page 5 of 21    <br />(5. LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION (LMA) FUNDING REQUEST, Continued) <br /> <br />Lowe pointed out that if the City is concerned about a chemical footprint, why would the City of Orono <br />use any road salt or sodium chloride on the roads during the winter. Lowe stated some of the chemicals <br />end up in the lake and are detectable there. The City of Orono has determined that the use of salt on our <br />roads is an acceptable trade-off for the safety it provides. If the Mayor and the Council have further <br />concerns about the use of Triclopyr on Lake Minnetonka, the LMA strongly suggests that you visit their <br />website at carmanbay.org and look at the documents posted there or the Council can ask additional <br />questions tonight. <br /> <br />Lowe stated in light of his comments here this evening and the reason it has been presented via email, the <br />LMA would respectfully ask the City of Orono to show their support by making a financial contribution <br />to this year’s herbicidal treatment and in the future, partner with the lakeshore residents and other Lake <br />Minnetonka mayors to advocate for herbicidal control of milfoil and more public funding for that control. <br />Lowe stated the folder on his computer concerning Carman Bay now contains over 800 files and that he <br />feels he and the dedicated volunteers from Carman Bay and some of the other bays that are being treated <br />are some of the most informed individuals in the Twin Cities when it comes to AIS control. Volunteers <br />from Carman Bay are here to answer the Council’s questions and the LMA welcomes an open discussion <br />on the merits of our view point. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what cities are not publicly supporting the LMA. <br /> <br />Lowe stated the City of Orono is one. <br /> <br />Osgood stated the other two cities are Wayzata and Minnetonka and they have declined to invite the bay <br />captains to make a request. <br /> <br />Lowe indicated Minnetonka has always had a big problem with the LMCD due to its huge levy and a very <br />small amount of lakeshore. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if Gray’s Bay will be treated in 2013. <br /> <br />Osgood indicated it probably will be treated at a very low level. Gray’s Bay was treated last year and the <br />treatment has been lasting pretty reliably at least two seasons. The scope of the treatments will depend on <br />the early season delineation, which cannot occur until the ice is gone and it may scope out some spot <br />areas that require treatment. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City Council’s job is to be fair to all of the Orono taxpayers. McMillan asked how <br />the City Council should say to the Orono taxpayers who do not live on Carman Bay and the ones who do <br />not live on Lake Minnetonka why they should subsidize a private funding source for herbicide treatment. <br />McMillan indicated Carman’s Bay can be mechanically harvested for the same cost and Orono would not <br />have to pay anything more. The private funding is also a tax donation for those citizens. McMillan <br />requested that Lowe explain how the Council can rationalize it to the other Orono citizens. <br /> <br />Lowe noted the LMCD has already determined that Lake Minnetonka is 75 percent public use and not a <br />private use. The harvesting of Carman Bay would cover about 10 to 15 acres and the herbicide treatment <br />would cover 90 acres. The milfoil harvesting also does not cover the middle of the bay. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 04/22/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/08/2013 <br />[Page 5 of 21]