My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
03-25-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:27:29 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 1:10:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 11, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 27 <br /> <br />(4. LMCC UPDATE, Continued) <br /> <br />For purposes of informal franchise renewal negotiations, the LMCC has identified certain past <br />performance concerns, including several franchise violations and future community cable related needs <br />and interests. These issues are addressed in a staff report entitled cable franchise enforcement history. <br />The LMCC intends to negotiate for a franchise that adequately addresses all past performance concerns <br />and future needs and interests. The following points highlight the LMCC’s negotiation priorities. This <br />information supplements but does not replace or limit the performance concerns and future needs <br />identified in the LMCC report. All of the information in the reports stands to be used in the negotiations. <br />The LMCC has attempted to prioritize the main points, and the first priority is to provide for full build-out <br />of the LMCC franchise area, including all underserved member cities, within five or fewer years. <br />Koenecke indicated she has requested Mediacom cover the first 350 feet of drop, coordination with other <br />communities in these subdivisions, and the securing of an appropriate bond to secure completion. The <br />reason the LMCC has elected to go with the 350 feet is that the majority of the complaints from Medina <br />has to do with residents who cannot receive serve. The LMCC felt the issue has to do with the length of <br />the driveway. Currently the LMCC requires the company to do a site survey, which measures the <br />distance from the plant. They then give the resident a formula to figure out how much the residents have <br />to pay. Due to the costs, the residents generally do not sign-up for the service. The figure of 350 feet was <br />determined following some research conducted on the internet that show there are companies currently <br />who are asking for 350 feet. <br /> <br />Koenecke stated one of the reports talks about Mediacom being a good performing system and outpaces <br />national trends in all areas except for digital and cable phone subscriptions, which means that their <br />income is slightly above the national average. Currently five of the seven cities have build-out issues. <br />Koenecke stated when companies have a long history of serving an area; you should be able to expect a <br />build-out at their expense and not at the expense of the subscribers. A newer company has to build the <br />entire infrastructure from scratch. In this particular case, the LMCC believes there should be full build- <br />out within five years. <br /> <br />The second priority identified is to require improvement in the reliability and technical quality of the <br />system, improvement of telephone answering times and customer response time to exceed FCC standards, <br />improvement of communications with customers about service changes, and require submission of <br />specific customer complaint information on a monthly basis. Basically the LMCC is asking for more <br />accountability and reporting. Some of the issues were identified in the technical report to ensure that <br />these things are done. The LMCC has been informed by Mediacom that they have improved phone <br />standards, and according to the survey, it appears the majority of the complaints have to do with major <br />outages lasting more than 24 hours. In the case of an outage, Mediacom should be giving refunds to all <br />subscribers, which is not currently being done, and that requirement will be put into the franchise <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Other priorities identified include providing support for Mediacom’s continued migration from analog <br />digital channels, obtain funding to replace PEG equipment with high-density digital equipment, establish <br />an agreed upon position for existing LMCC channels, potentially increasing the number of LMCC <br />channels to accommodate live video feeds, etc. Some of these items were brought up in the focus groups, <br />which is why they were added. The focus group also discussed raising money through various <br />fundraisers, policing live programming, updating funding, including upfront grants, and implement <br />packages for member city sites. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/11/2013 [Page 3 of 27]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.