My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
03-25-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:27:29 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 1:10:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 11, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 27 <br /> <br />(7. #13-3591 ERVIN WACHMAN – OUTLOT C BAYSIDE FARMS 2ND – <br />SUBD/PRELIMINARY PLAT – RESOLUTION NO. 6209, Continued) <br /> <br />Curtis asked if the trees are proposed spruce trees or existing. <br /> <br />Coffman indicated those are proposed trees. <br /> <br />Curtis stated in the area where the new driveway will be located, she is not sure specifically where the <br />trees are in relation to that and whether they are on the subject property or the neighboring properties. <br /> <br />Coffman stated the existing trees are in the middle of the new private road, which will require the removal <br />of three or four spruce trees. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how the access piece should be addressed. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the resolution requires approval be received from Hennepin County as part of the final plat. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated the reasoning behind the wording is that the hookup is to a county road and Hennepin <br />County would need to approve that and that it is not a city requirement. If the county approves the <br />driveway access, from Staff’s perspective they would be okay with that access, which is along the lines of <br />the original resolution. If the access is denied by the county, some other arrangement would need to be <br />worked out. <br /> <br />Levang asked if Hennepin County is okay with the access. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated they are supporting the City’s 1994 documents, but that the e-mail does not really <br />provide any directions besides indicating they support the City’s original resolutions. <br /> <br />Levang asked who would make that application to the county. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the developer would. <br /> <br />Anderson moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6209, a Resolution Approving <br />The Preliminary Plat for the Property Located at Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. VOTE: <br />Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*8. #13-3592 PILLAR HOMES ON BEHALF OF BRIAN & JUDITH BUTTERFIELD – 3955 <br />WATERTOWN ROAD – VARIANCES – RESOLUTION NO. 6210 <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6210, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395, for the property located at 3955 Watertown <br />Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/11/2013 [Page 12 of 27]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.