Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 11, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  Page 12 of 24   <br />   <br /> <br />(6. #12-3582 COLSON CUSTOM HOMES ON BEHALF OF BWB HOLDINGS, LLC, 4731 <br />NORTH SHORE DRIVE – VARIANCE – RESOLUTION – TABLED, Continued) <br /> <br />1. The proposed patio to be reoriented so as to not encroach into the 20-foot bluff impact zone. <br /> <br />2. The proposed deck should be reoriented and/or resized so that there is no more encroachment <br /> into the 30-foot bluff setback than that of the home. <br /> <br />In 2006, the submitted survey contained topographical information that indicated the bluff was 24 feet <br />from the corner of the proposed home, outside the bluff impact zone, yet within the 30-foot bluff setback. <br />The top of bluff was missing from the current applicant’s initial survey. The applicant has since provided <br />a revised survey showing the top of bluff to Staff the day of the Planning Commission meeting. The <br />information reviewed by the Planning Commission at their January meeting was based on the revised <br />survey dated 1/18/13 depicting a similar top of bluff location as the 2006 survey. The recommendations <br />made by the Planning Commission were also based on the 1/18/13 survey. Due to the timing, Planning <br />Staff did not have an opportunity to fully review the 1/18/13 survey. <br /> <br />Following the Planning Commission meeting, Staff reviewed the bluff as shown on the current survey <br />and disagreed with its depicted location. The topographic information provided on the recent surveys <br />differs quite a bit from the 2006 survey. For instance, the slope on the western portion of the lot in the <br />2006 survey is depicted as 20-25 percent, while the 2013 survey reflects approximately 50 percent slopes <br />in the same location. <br /> <br />The location of the proposed home on the current plan is consistent with the 2006 approved plan. Due to <br />the other constraints of the property, the proposed location may still be the best option even though the <br />top of bluff appears to be as close as 12 feet from the proposed home in places. The 30-foot bluff setback <br />extends halfway through the home. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission’s direction at the January meeting was to move the patio out of the 20-foot <br />bluff impact zone and reorient the deck to encroach no more than the house based on the location of the <br />top of bluff shown on the 1/18/13 survey. The applicant has provided a plan responding to the direction <br />on both the patio and deck. The bluff location has also been revised based on the current topographic <br />information. Staff has reviewed and agrees with the top of bluff as shown on the most recent survey <br />dated 2/1/13. <br /> <br />The revised top of bluff location results in an even more restricted buildable envelop than previously <br />realized. The applicant’s proposed home is generally consistent with the 2006 plans and reflects only an <br />additional four feet of depth added on to the garage to make it more functional. This results in the 10’ x <br />13’ side proposed setback from the alley. To further push the house away from the bluff results in an <br />unreasonably small house considering the established driveway location. <br /> <br />The proposed location will result in minor grading within the bluff and bluff impact zone to accommodate <br />drainage. <br /> <br />Planning Staff has reviewed the revised plans and recommends approval of the variances as requested <br />consistent with the 2/1/13 survey and revised house plans showing the reoriented deck. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the Planning Commission reviewed the latest surveys. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 02/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/11/2013 <br />[Page 12 of 24]