15-3759 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section 2-12 Because we have no civil amenities all renters are required to take their garbage with them when they leave.A large garbage can with a plastic bag fs provided as a collection receptacle for them to bag up the garbage for this function. Section 2-13 The owner is on the deed as the designated trustee of the family trust. Some other thoughts are that Big Isfand historically has been a destination,whether it is families enjoying their cabins or when the Amusement park existed or as it was transformed i�to the Veterans Camp people have always enjoyed it under a short term basis. Which leads to the question that since the Three Rivers Park District has jur(sdiction over both the properties the County has bought up over the years as well as the Veteran's Camp property which the City of Orono now owns, how does this affect the Districts ability to if they so choose in the future to open the Veterans Camp or their other areas of the Island to camping for a fee,this would fall under short term rental for all practical purposes.Wouid this ordinance conflict with that and who would be assigned to faciiitate that,along with enforcement?I have never seen any police representation from the Orono police force or the Three River Police force on the island.The only representation that responds to calls currently is the Hennepin County Sheriff Water Patrol which already has their hands full due to the activity on the water. How does this impact the Power Squadron Property,they essentially are collecting a fee from members which in turn are allowed to camp overnight on the property, how will this proposed amendment effect them in fairness to how the rest of the properties are affected. If a rented boat is moored,anchored to or beached on the island and its occupants are staying overnight wouldn't that fall under this ordinance as well7 How would that be enforced? We understand the implications of having a short term rental in neighborhoods with smaller lots that have had larger homes constructed/reconstructed on them,has a higher level for the potential for neighboring properties to be concerned and thus contributing to the city's desire to regulate these activities is justified. I would like to ask that consideration be made to exempt the island from this ordinance based upon the historical use and activities of the island properties,with regard to the items mentioned above and the ability to apply them equally to all the properties on the island. Due to these historical,current and possible projected uses in the future it would seem that an exception would be suited for the island properties. Thank you for conside�ation of these issues as it applles to the current amendment proposal and the request to exempt the island properties form the proposal.