Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 16,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart noted 15 and 4 are very similar and that he would suggest keeping Item No. 4 and removing 15. <br /> Lemke stated he likes the ordinance and what it is attempting to accomplish. <br /> Leskinen stated she is not sure if it does any good to keep No. 2 if Item No. 1 is staying. Leskinen stated <br /> it sounds like Items 1, 4, 6 8, 9, 15 are being kept in. <br /> Thiesse noted Items 4 and 15 were similar and that 15 was going to be removed. <br /> Barnhart stated he heard that Items 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 11 should remain. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 9:45 p.m. <br /> Jim Cornick, Council Member, stated he would like some discussion on Item No. 8. Cornick suggested <br /> the Planning Commission give some consideration to raising it to 21. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 9:46 p.m. <br /> Lemke stated he likes that idea. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to raise the age of the rent to 21. <br /> Landgraver moved,McGrann seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 15-3759, City <br /> of Orono,Text Amendment: Vacation Rentals as amended,with Items 1,4,6,8,9,and 11 <br /> remaining in the ordinance and the other items being stricken. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 1, Schoenzeit <br /> opposed. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the ordinance is redundant with City Code, infringes on property owners' rights, and is <br /> regulating something that is not an issue. <br /> Thiesse noted everything left in the ordinance is specific to the licensure. <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br />