My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
15-3759
Orono
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Ordinance Development
>
15-3759 Vacation Rentals
>
15-3759
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:28 PM
Creation date
1/27/2017 3:19:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 16,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leskinen recommended the requirement for the owner's name be taken out since the deed on the property <br /> could say the name of a trust. Leskinen stated for homestead purposes there needs to be a whole separate <br /> document filed in order for a trust to be listed. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the owner's representative needs to be identified. <br /> Lemke asked if anyone else has problems with No. 3. <br /> Thiesse stated he does since the City has at least two people that are complying with everything else but it <br /> is not their primary residence. <br /> Landgraver stated in his view there are two situations, one on Big Island and then everybody else. <br /> Landgraver noted if you are on Big Island, is it considered recreational property. <br /> McGrann questioned how the City can stop someone if they want to buy a property in Orono as a rental. <br /> Barnhart stated the City could simply require a license. <br /> Schoenzeit noted the Your Boat Club rents out two homes already and they are not registered. Schoenzeit <br /> stated in his view this is a slippery slope and that the City should simply enforce their nuisance <br /> regulations. <br /> Leskinen stated if they strip everything out of the draft ordinance that they know is already addressed in <br /> City Code to some level,they would essentially be asking potential people to register their property as a <br /> rental property so that the City is aware the property could potentially be rented. Leskinen stated in her <br /> opinion it is more of a registration than a license. <br /> Barnhart stated the primary benefit is that the City has a responsible party that can respond to complaints. <br /> McGrann indicated he is fine with the license requirement as long as it is something the City can revoke if <br /> need be. McGrann stated the City has not had any issues and that they need to respect everyone's <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.