Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2011 <br /> April 11, 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Description of Request <br /> In the later part of 1993, the City granted a hardcover variance and height variance for a <br /> residence to be constructed on the undeveloped property. The height variance involved a <br /> separate section or addition of the house that contained three stories. The current application <br /> involves a walkout design. Based on the height definition variance, Section 10.02, Definition <br /> 13, vertical height is determined at existing elevations not final or proposed elevation. Refer <br /> to Exhibit L, the northeast elevation and the northwest elevation. The code asks that a <br /> comparison be made between the highest existing elevation(943 at garage level) and the adjusted <br /> elevation of the basement floor (934+ 10' = 944). Vertical height is measured from the lowest <br /> of the two elevations. Top or highest point is measured to the mean distance between highest <br /> point of the pitched roof and the ceiling joist, refer to the northwest elevation. The legal height <br /> is 35'+. Refer to the southeast or lakeside elevation, the peak height of the structure from the <br /> lakeside is approximately 47'. <br /> As in the earlier variance application, the design and shape of the house results from the unique <br /> shaped building envelope and need to conserve horizontal hardcover improvement. The property <br /> is surrounded by lakeshore on the three sides. Review Exhibits E and F, in the earlier review <br /> the total lot area was found to be 55,500 s.f. The current application shows a total lot area of <br /> 62,660 s.f. with an increase in the 75-250' setback area at 19,210 s.f. (original was 13,700). <br /> Staff called the surveyor to question 7,000+ s.f. of additional area. The surveyor advised that <br /> the same field crew shot the elevations in both 1992 and 1994. The area is flat and they shot <br /> more elevations resulting in the redefined shoreline at 929.4. Staff has asked for the field <br /> information from the surveyor to reconfirm findings. <br /> The applicants' consultant proposes a drainfield to maintain runoff from roof of structure to <br /> offset the 4.2% excess of hardcover. Review Exhibit L, specifically the "Sections", note that <br /> all outdoor use areas have been stacked to conserve on hardcover by placing veranda <br /> immediately over grade level patio and topping veranda with a deck at third lakeside level. <br /> The property has not been assessed for sewer. Review Exhibits M and N, the sewer is <br /> approximately 120' away from property boundary. It will be the applicants' responsibility to <br /> extend sewer to the property. Sewer connection charge will consist of the following charges: <br /> Plant charge $ 225.00 <br /> Unit fee for 1970 LS-1 project 4,263.00 <br /> Lift station 10 by-pass charge 2,269.00 <br /> Front footage charge $26.25 per front ft. (190' x $26.25) 4,987.50 <br /> Total fee $11,744.50 <br /> Service availability charge $ 850.00 <br />