Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br /> page 2 of 2 <br /> April 28, 1995 <br /> Zoning File #2011 <br /> Neighbors in attendance at the hearing noted concern with the location of a future dock to serve <br /> the property and any potential impact on the existing trees. Applicants advised that they would <br /> not be placing their dock at the south shoreline because of the location of the wetlands but would <br /> locate the dock at the higher elevations along the east shoreline. Applicants advised the <br /> neighbors that they too were concerned with any removal of trees and have specifically placed <br /> the house to preserve as many of the mature trees. In fact, it is their intention to plant many <br /> more trees at the time of the development of a final landscape plan. Applicants were advised <br /> of the need for permits from the City if trees were to be removed in the 0-75' setback area. <br /> Six of the seven member Commission voted to approve the application as proposed adopting the <br /> unique findings and hardships set forth in applicants' addendum and as noted in the original <br /> variance resolution of 1993. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings <br /> and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. Staff has added an additional <br /> condition dealing with the placement of a future dock at the east shoreline rather than allowing <br /> the encroachment of the wetlands along the extensive southern shoreline. <br /> COLTNCIL ACTION REQLTESTED: <br /> To approve, deny or amend the enclosed approval resolution. <br /> ch <br />