Laserfiche WebLink
, �� � <br /> Request for Council Action continued <br /> Pa�e 3 <br /> October 19,2000 <br /> r2630 Gre;�and Stephanie Larsen <br /> 2. Should the applicant be allowed to trade existing driveway(which significantly exceeds the <br /> driveway allowance approved in 1987)for additional deck in excess of the 13� s.f.deck that <br /> previously existed? <br /> Staff Recommendation: No, based on the 1987 approval which allowed much less dri�•e�`•ay <br /> than currently exists. <br /> 3. Should the excess driveway that currently exists be allowed to remain in light of the 1987 <br /> allotment? (1,299 s.f. existing vs 810 s.f. allowed in 1987) <br /> Staff Recommendation:The driveway access already esceeds the masimum 20'width allowed <br /> by Code Section 6.0�Subd.9B.The 30'width allowed in 1987 is�varranted by the narro�ti�ness <br /> of Rest Point Road and the fences which restrict visibility along it, as�r�ell as the lack of on- <br /> street parking due to the narrowness of the road. All portions of driveway in escess of 30's27' <br /> as approved in 1987 should be removed. Unfortunateh�,the current o���ner will be penalized <br /> for actions or inactions of his precedent owners,which Council may wish to consider... <br /> STAFF RECO`TMENDA"TION <br /> l. Approve the 0-75' variances for replacement of retaining walls as proposed, subject to a <br /> vegetative screening plan to be approved by staff prior to issuance of a land alteration permit <br /> for the �valls. <br /> 2. Approve a 75-250' hardcover variance as follows: <br /> a) Applicant to remove 1,727 s.f. of plastic/fabric from landscaping areas. <br /> b) Applicant to reduce driveway from 1,299 s.f. to 810 s.f. <br /> c) Applicant allowed to replace the former 13� s.f. deck�vith a new 135 s.f. patio. <br /> d) Final 7�-250' hardcover as follows: <br /> Existing house/attached garage/covered porch 2,650 s.f. <br /> Driveway after removals 810 s.f. <br /> Concrete & wood steps 135 s.f. <br /> New Patio 135 s.f. <br /> Total 3,730 s.f. (41.2%) <br /> COU�ICIL ACTION REQUESTED <br /> Option 1. Refer application back to Planning Commission for further consideration of <br /> inforniation that has come to light since the October 16 meeting. <br /> Option 2. Adopt the attached resolution based on the above Staff Recommendation. <br />