Laserfiche WebLink
, { � <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANrIING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 16,2000 <br /> you know. It���ould trim another 87 feet off. What aze your opinions on that? <br /> Kluth: I remember some times where we've had Applicants come back several times because <br /> we had offered them that they build on the existing site the same size. I can remember a couple <br /> vividly that we were holding the line on that,where people wanted a couple of feet here and <br /> there. So I'm—I'm in favor of holding the line as���e have in the other applications, which is <br /> to offer the Applicant the same size deck that was taken off but not to increase that hardcover. <br /> That's my thought. <br /> Stoddard: What he's saying is literally allow a 100 square foot patio. <br /> Berg: 13�. <br /> Stoddard: That's not the math I get,though. <br /> Kluth: Well, I will just say the size of the deck that was taken off. The survey shows it to be <br /> 135, so�ti•hatever it was. <br /> Lindquist: Do you follow what we're asking? <br /> Larsen: I hope you understand that the deck that�ve're getting credit for has been removed <br /> already as well. <br /> Berg: Yeah. 'The deck you removed was 13� square feet. Right? <br /> Kluth: Right. <br /> Berg: And that's what we're recommending— <br /> Larsen: And that's not shown on the survey right now. <br /> Berg: That's what you had and that's r��hat's calculated in our hardcover,the new. We have <br /> the proposed here, and that's calculated, and the proposed is in�vhat}�ou had and�ve're asking <br /> you to get down,to go back to the 13� square foot. <br /> Stoddard: I�vas lost there,you lost me. You're say�ng— <br /> Larsen: I just looked do�m and I seen the hardcover calculation. We still have a porch there <br /> that's the same size as the deck that we already removed. I just didn't«�ant anybody to think <br /> PAGE 37 <br />