Laserfiche WebLink
� � , , .� � <br /> - �-7 <br /> � <br /> _ � c�t� �� oRo�o <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> Np_ 2217 <br /> � e <br /> � -'� � A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br /> A VARIANCE TO <br /> MIINICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.22, SIIBDIVISION 1 � 2 <br /> AND SECTZON 10.24, SIIBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> FILE #1157 <br /> WHEREAS, Walter F. Krake (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br /> owner of the property located at 1380 Rest Point Road within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 6 and the Westerly 40 feet of Lot 7 , Subdivision of Lot 14 , Rest <br /> Point Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter °'the property") ; <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision S (B) and Section 10.22, <br /> Subdivisions 1 and 2 to permit the construction of a room and attached <br /> garage addition which will result in 38.8� hardcover in the 75-250' <br /> lakeshore setback zone where only 25$ hardcover is normally allowed, and <br /> resulting in a street setback of 28' wYiere a 35' street setback is normally <br /> required, and resulting in an encroachment of 4' into the average lakeshore <br /> setback zone where no encroach�ent is normally allowed. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: . <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1157 . <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June <br /> 15, 1987, and upon applicant's revision of the hardcover proposal from <br /> 48.6$ down to 38.8$, voted 3-3 on a motion to recommend approval of <br /> 38.8� hardcover and the street setback and average lakeshore setback <br /> variances as proposed. <br /> 4. The encroachment of 4 ' into the average lakeshore setback zone <br /> will result in a 3 degree view reduction to the property to the east. <br /> However, due to the existing topography, screening, and proposed <br /> privacy fence, the 4 ' encroachment has little or no effect on the lake <br /> views enjoyed by the neighboring properties. <br /> 5. The street setback of 28' where 35' is required, results from the <br /> e:ctention of the existing front line of the house which is already <br /> - 26.4' from the street. This setback will still allow for auto backup <br /> and parking area within the property boundaries. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />