Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 14, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 6 of 19  <br /> <br />(5. #13-3631 TODD HOLMERS ON BEHALF OF LANDSOURCE, LLC, 3700 NORTHERN <br />AVENUE – VACATE EASEMENT – FINAL PLAT DOCUMENTS REVIEW – RESOLUTION NO. <br />6420, Continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in addition, more trees will be removed than what was originally proposed to <br />accommodate homes, driveways, and site grading. Gaffron stated a tree replacement plan has not been <br />provided at this time. <br /> <br />Staff recommends adoption of the resolution vacating the 1982 easement. The Council should review the <br />final plat drawings and revisions that have been submitted since the preliminary plat and advise Staff and <br />applicant of any concerns. Gaffron stated a resolution for final plat approval will be brought forward at <br />the July 28 City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Levang noted on Page 2 of the resolution Staff points out that the functional rear lot area within Lot 6 <br />decreases significantly. Levang asked what that decrease is related to. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that is the area where the stormwater pond will now be located, which results in Lot 6 <br />having a smaller back yard from what was originally proposed and will be similar to Lots 3, 4, and 5. <br /> <br />Levang asked how many feet there will be to the buffer. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted it will not be a wetland buffer since it is a retention pond but that there will be a setback of <br />20 to 30 feet. <br /> <br />Anderson asked if the City has some sort of trigger or follow-up to ensure that area remains the way it is <br />now proposed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated once the plans are approved, that is the way the homes will need to be constructed. <br />Levang asked if that would change the calculation for the amount of dry land in that area. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it does change the amount of dry lot for Lot 6 and potentially Lot 5 but that he has not <br />done that calculation. <br /> <br />Levang stated she would like to see what that calculation is. Levang stated Page 2 also notes that the <br />planting plan, which is Exhibit D3, shows that significant trees will be removed but does not provide a <br />replacement plan. Levang asked when that plan will be available for the City Council to review. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the applicant will need to address that. Gaffron displayed the current plan showing the <br />trees that will be removed. Gaffron stated the initial hope was that some of the vegetation would be <br />retained in the front but at this point the expectation is that the majority of that vegetation will not be <br />saved as a result of the construction process. Because of that removal, the applicant has agreed that he <br />will provide a planting plan that provides some buffering in that area but Staff has not seen that plan as of <br />yet. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the original plans included a designation that a certain stand of trees had to remain along <br />the corridor. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/28/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/14/2014 <br />[Page 6 of 19]