Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 14, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 4 of 19  <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />4. #14-3673 JUSTIN McCOY ON BEHALF OF ORONO PUBLIC SCHOOLS – 685, 765, 795 <br />AND 800 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH – VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT FOR MONUMENT SIGNS – RESOLUTION NO. 6419 <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to install a total of four monument signs identifying each of the <br />Orono School properties along Old Crystal Bay Road North. Each of the signs will be four feet wide and <br />eight feet tall and will be constructed of an aluminum cabinet. The signs are not proposed to have internal <br />illumination and will be set back ten feet from the street property. <br /> <br />The following variances are being requested: <br /> <br />1. Allowance to construct four monument signs with approximately 14 square feet of sign copy area <br /> each along the roadway where one 12 square foot sign per use is permitted; <br /> <br />2. Approval of the aluminum material for the sign base where materials similar in appearance to the <br /> principal structure consisting of brick, stucco, natural stone or other durable materials should be <br /> used. <br /> <br />Curtis noted a conditional use permit is necessary for school uses within the RR-1B zoning district. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the Planning Commission at its June meeting voted 6 to 0 on a motion to recommend <br />approval granting a sign variance and a conditional use permit to install four signs according to the <br />submitted sign plan, with the recommendation that the City Council waive the application fee. <br /> <br />Curtis noted that Staff recommends approval of the variances for material size and the number of signs <br />per use as well as the conditional use permit to install the signs according to the general site plan <br />provided. Building permits will be required prior to the installation of the signage. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the City Council should consider adopting or amending the approval resolution. Council <br />should consider directing Staff regarding the fee waiver suggested by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Anderson asked why the fee is being recommended to be waived. <br /> <br />Bremer noted she was in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting and that it was not a request <br />that the school district made but that it was more something the Planning Commission felt would be <br />appropriate due to the public nature of the entity. Bremer stated there was not a lot of discussion about it <br />but it was per the motion. <br /> <br />Printup stated that was the only question he had on the application and that he is not inclined to waive the <br />fee. <br /> <br />Anderson stated it was not requested of the City and that she does not feel it is necessarily warranted. <br /> <br />Levang stated in her view the fee should not be waived. Levang stated one of the issues that had been <br />raised at the Planning Commission was the frost and how that could heave the sign. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/28/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/14/2014 <br />[Page 4 of 19]