My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
07-28-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:39:17 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 10:45:48 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 14, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 16 of 19 <br />(8. JOSEPH CHURCH – 4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING – ENCROACHMENT <br />AGREEMENT, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated one item left out of the resolution inadvertently was the existing deck and that he would <br />recommend that be added to the encroachment agreement. Mattick stated he reviewed the proposed work <br />and not the survey. <br /> <br />Levang noted there are two decks. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the deck on the back of the house is located on their property. <br /> <br />Mattick stated it would be the bigger deck which is off to the left and should be included in the <br />encroachment agreement. Mattick stated if the City needs to ever access that area, the deck would need to <br />be removed. <br /> <br />Levang noted Staff’s report says that all of the encroachments should be addressed with the encroachment <br />agreement and that she would like all the encroachments clearly stated. <br /> <br />Curtis stated based on the survey, they could label and add the individual wall areas. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the survey perhaps should be referenced rather than the work plans since the work plans do <br />not address all of the encroaching items. <br /> <br />Levang asked as far as Council Member Anderson’s thoughts regarding the flag pole, whether that would <br />be a different issue. <br /> <br />Mattick stated he does not believe the pole itself is in the fire lane but that the retaining wall probably is. <br /> <br />Mattick noted Mr. Church could not sign off on the flag pole and retaining wall since they are located on <br />a different property. <br /> <br />Joseph Church had nothing to add to Staff’s report. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the resolution will come before the City Council at its next meeting <br /> <br /> <br />9. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AGREEMENT – RESOLUTION NO. <br />6422 <br /> <br />Mack stated Hennepin County has requested the City of Orono enter into a three year joint Cooperation <br />Agreement as a partner with Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. <br />Mack noted the City has not been an active partner as a recipient of funding for housing programs over <br />the past three year contract term. <br /> <br />It is Staff’s recommendation the City enter into the agreement in order to preserve the City’s options in <br />the event a need arises in the future. Mack stated future redevelopment planning efforts for the Navarre <br />area may be a potential consideration. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/28/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/14/2014 <br />[Page 16 of 19]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.