Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 14, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 14 of 19  <br />(7. #14-3674 LORI GHERARDI ON BEHALF OF WOLVERTON PLACE, LLC – 4570 <br />WOLVERTON PLACE – CONSERVATION EASEMENT VACATION, Continued) <br /> <br />Curtis indicated she would forward the draft resolution to Mr. Stephenson so he can review it prior to the <br />next City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he would also be happy to sit down with the applicant and work through the numbers. <br /> <br />Printup asked if he is okay with the vacation request. <br /> <br />Stephenson stated he is and that he just has a problem with the fee reimbursement. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the approval of the vacation should be conditioned upon the fee reimbursement. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Anderson seconded, Application No. 14-3674, Lori Gherardi on behalf of Waterton <br />Place, LLC, 4570 Wolverton Place, to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving the vacation of <br />the conservation easement located at 4570 Wolverton Place, subject to $4,820 being reimbursed to <br />the City. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />8. JOSEPH CHURCH – 4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING – ENCROACHMENT <br />AGREEMENT <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicant approached the City in June of 2013 with a request for permission to conduct <br />some maintenance improvements and minor changes to the driveway and sidewalk access to his property <br />which are located entirely within the City right-of-way. At that time the applicant was requesting <br />approval to expand the driveway and reconstruct the stairs and sidewalk that access the home. The <br />applicant indicated that he would be agreeable to the future removal of the deck/patio and also entering <br />into an encroachment agreement. The applicant was instructed to provide a plan for the desired <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Curtis stated since that time, the applicant has provided a survey for the property and has revised his <br />request. At the present time the applicant is not requesting approval for any expansion of hardcover but is <br />proposing to rebuild the stairs and sidewalk and driveway in the same footprint as existing. In addition, <br />he intends to re-grade the side yard so that the retaining walls on the east side of the driveway can be <br />removed. The lower grading would allow for two vehicles to park in the driveway and accommodate the <br />vehicle doors opening without actually enlarging the driveway footprint. The driveway would be <br />replaced in-kind. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the stairs, deck and retaining walls under the deck would remain at this time. The applicant <br />is amenable to re-evaluation and removal of the deck at a later date. However, the driveway and sidewalk <br />projects have a higher priority as the failing driveway, sidewalk and stairs are causing water to enter the <br />home. <br /> <br />Curtis noted that Planning Staff and the City’s Consulting Engineer, Brian Simmons, have visited the site <br />to review the proposed work. Technically a permit does not apply as the work will be conducted within <br />the City right-of-way, but an encroachment agreement, erosion control escrow and plan will be required. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/28/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/14/2014 <br />[Page 14 of 19]