My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
07-14-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:37:36 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 10:37:09 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, June 23, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 18 of 30 <br /> <br />(8. 14-3666 LUKE KUJAWA ON BEHALF OF EOF INVESTMENTS, LLC, 1440-1442 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE – REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan commented the parking lot being proposed is huge. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the Planning Commission looked at the site and did not believe a 10-foot setback from the <br />neighbor’s property was adequate for a buffer. From a Staff’s perspective, a 5 to 10-foot setback from the <br />lake does not provide the protection that the City would like from an environmental standpoint. <br /> <br />McMillan noted what is being proposed cannot be built given the lack of setback from the lake and is not <br />realistic. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the plan helps illustrates how to achieve parking and how close they are to meeting the <br />standard. Gaffron stated in order to gain additional setback to the lake, one of the rows of parking would <br />need to be eliminated. <br /> <br />McMillan stated elimination of one of residential properties would improve the current situation. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated there are a few things that are important to consider if they want to keep 1440 residential. <br />Kujawa noted the property has been used commercially over the years and that Mr. Johnson did purchase <br />his property next to a property that was partially zoned commercial. Both of the residential lots have an <br />easement over them that have been in place for a number of years and was the case when Mr. Johnson <br />purchased his property. Kujawa noted the shoreline has also been taken into account when determining <br />the number of dock slips that would be allowed. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated when they first started this process approximately four years ago, there was a list of issues <br />that had to be addressed, which they have been doing. A valet company was hired last year to be there on <br />the weekends to reduce the parking issues and the City has basically insisted that there is a permanent <br />lease over those residential properties, which makes it difficult to say that the properties are residential. <br />Kujawa stated those properties have basically existed as commercial for the past 40 years. <br /> <br />Kujawa stated one of the biggest issues that came up four years ago and has been a recurring issue is the <br />fact that there is two entrances to the parking area and there is nowhere for anyone with a trailer to pull in <br />and turn around. Elimination of one of the entrances has been a main issue and that steps have been taken <br />to keep all the vehicles on the side of the boat club, but that it is very difficult to accomplish. <br /> <br />Kujawa noted there is marina on the other side of Tanager Bay that has zero parking available on their <br />site and that all their customers need to cross the road. Kujawa stated requiring them to have all their <br />parking on the same side is unfair given the other marina. Kujawa stated they have been attempting to <br />improve the situation and clean up the residential lots but that there is no much room left for residential <br />when you take the parking easement into consideration. Kujawa indicated they have spent a number of <br />hours with the Planning Commission and Staff in an attempt to improve the situation long-term. <br /> <br />McMillan stated there is a reason that it has not been 100 percent commercial and that is because there <br />has always been a feeling on the Council’s part of trying to protect the residential area. McMillan stated <br />the shoreline for 1440 and 1442 has been used to calculate dock slips but the idea was not to have the <br />docks be located at 1442 or 1440. McMillan stated the City has always been hesitant to let those two lots <br />go 100 percent commercial. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 07/14/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 06/23/2014 <br />[Page 18 of 30]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.