Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 16, 2016 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 21 of 34  <br />  <br /> <br />Curtis stated the wetland will not be touched. The setback, as determined by the Watershed District and <br />the City, required the developer to grant the City easements protecting that area. In addition, the <br />conservation easement also helps to protect the area. The developer will be conducting some buckthorn <br />removal in that area but it does not allow him to clear-cut the area. Curtis pointed out the entire perimeter <br />of the site has a conservation easement on it as well as a wetland buffer area. <br /> <br />Brad Pass, 235 North Arm Lane, stated if the City is concerned about the contrived appearance of the <br />boulevard and are considering cutting down a number of trees because the appearance might be contrived, <br />they should consider the appearance of having a treeless area in the middle of a wooded area, which is <br />what is contrived. <br /> <br />Pat Thull stated she misunderstood what the purpose of tonight’s meeting was because she did not have <br />the background information relating to the application. Thull stated her understanding was that it related <br />to a reduction in trees. Thull asked whether those trees could be relocated to another area. <br /> <br />Leskinen noted what is at issue this evening is not trees that will be cut down but relates to how many <br />trees the builder will be required to plant. <br /> <br />Thull asked if 15 trees will not be planted along the boulevard, whether they can be relocated elsewhere. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated the Planning Commission can discuss that option. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated based on what he has heard, the neighbors would prefer that the trees that are being <br />proposed to not be planted along the boulevard be planted elsewhere on the site. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the placement of the trees on the boulevard is land that is not considered private and that <br />there would have to be some additional protections built in to assure that the tree that was planted by the <br />developer in a different area will be sustained for two years. The trees would need to be placed in an area <br />that the developer controls. Curtis stated she understands wanting to incorporate additional trees on the <br />property but that it needs to be pointed out that an additional step would need to be taken if that happens. <br /> <br />Lemke asked if there are supposed to be 42 trees. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the revised plan shows additional trees along Bayside Road. The circled areas depict the <br />trees and the type of tree is listed on the lower right of the plan. <br /> <br />Landgraver noted a number of the neighbors have expressed concerns about protecting the beauty of the <br />area but that it sounds like the developer has taken those things into consideration. Landgraver noted the <br />City Council has also weighed on this application. What the Planning Commission has before them <br />tonight is responsive to the concern raised by the City Council that the boulevard area be made more <br />natural looking. <br /> <br />Landgraver moved, McGrann seconded, to approve Application #13-3630, Bill Coffman on behalf <br />of Erwin Wachman, Bayside Meadows, granting of a reduction in the number of trees to be planted <br />along the boulevard. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 10/21/2013 <br />Approval of PC Minutes 09/16/2013 [Page 21 of 34]