My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
10-21-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:40:12 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 3:35:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
431
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 16, 2016 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 34 <br /> <br />Engineer. McGrann stated in his view the Planning Commission should table the application to get more <br />clarity to what is being proposed. <br /> <br />Curtis stated a meeting on site with the applicant’s engineer will resolve the issues and that Staff would <br />like to get the recommendation of the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked whether the Planning Commission has provided enough direction to the applicant on the <br />other aspects of the application. Leskinen recommended the stairs be limited to four feet in width. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she would like the Planning Commission to provide direction on the lakeshore and slope <br />issues as far as appearance and whether vegetation should be included on the slope. <br /> <br />Schwingler commented a rain garden might be one option to help handle the runoff. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted the property has been clear cut and the ground is showing on top of the berm. Thiesse <br />pointed out there is also no silt fencing. <br /> <br />Dutra stated in what they have received so far from the engineer, there is nothing saying that they cannot <br />do something due to technical issues. Dutra stated they are not attempting to create a better view from the <br />walkout but that they are attempting to divert the water from the back yard and correct the erosion issues. <br /> <br />Landgraver recommended the applicant limit the amount of removal in the 0-75 foot zone as much as <br />possible. <br /> <br />Schwingler stated if the Planning Commission looks at the issues for consideration outlined in Staff’s <br />report, a variance being granted would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The issue that needs <br />to be dealt with is the water runoff that is caused, in part, by the city-owned easement. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit commented the City should help him resolve that issue. <br /> <br />Schwingler stated there are options they can consider to help mitigate the water, such as a rain garden or a <br />swale. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the direction she is hearing from the Planning Commission is to have the City Engineer <br />review the situation and arrive at a solution that disturbs the 0-75 foot zone as little as possible and then <br />mitigate or screen the area from the lake as best they can. <br /> <br />Landgraver noted they should also comply with the four-foot width on the stairway. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit requested they also provide an updated cross-section showing the 75-foot setback. <br /> <br />McGrann moved, Landgraver seconded, to table Application $13-3623, Clairson Dutra on behalf of <br />Lin Yan, 1330 Cherry Place, conditional use permit and variance. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*5. #13-3627 RICHARD ETRHEIM AND REBECCA SHABAZ, 2216 SHADYWOOD ROAD, <br />VARIANCE <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 10/21/2013 <br />Approval of PC Minutes 09/16/2013 [Page 7 of 34]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.