Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Tuesday, May 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 20 of 23  <br /> <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br /> <br />12. LAKE MINNETONKA SCENIC BYWAY <br /> <br />Loftus stated Wayzata has proposed a Lake Minnetonka scenic byway, with discussions going on for <br />approximately the past year. In February Wayzata hosted an informational meeting with representatives <br />from the 14 lake communities. Loftus stated Staff’s memo includes the responses received from the <br />various cities on whether they would be interested in pursuing further study of the scenic byway. Loftus <br />stated the draft resolution proposed by Wayzata has been included in the Council’s packet. <br /> <br />Loftus suggested the City Council discuss the pros and cons of the scenic byway. Loftus indicated she <br />has received calls from two former mayors regarding the long history that Orono has had with traffic on <br />those county roads and their capacity. Traffic counts have been obtained from Hennepin County on <br />County Roads 15 and 51 in Orono. <br /> <br />Printup asked what this stretch of roadway is designated as in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the Comprehensive Plan designates them largely as scenic parkways and consist mainly of <br />county roads. The intent originally was to give them a designation that attempts to limit the amount of <br />traffic on them while at the same time knowing that they provide access to a variety of houses. Gaffron <br />stated a number of the scenic routes being proposed have houses every 100 feet. <br /> <br />Printup stated it is interesting that Orono has been kind of ahead of the curve in attempting to keep traffic <br />counts down over the past four decades but yet recognizing that scenic parkways are a way to help <br />preserve the area. Printup stated he does not see how it makes sense for Orono to jump on board with the <br />scenic byway since Orono has already designated a number of the roads as scenic parkways and traffic is <br />already a concern. <br /> <br />Bremer indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Printup. Bremer noted there were two local <br />cities who indicated they are not in favor of the scenic byway and that other cities have not weighed in yet <br />on the matter. <br /> <br />Bremer stated she is struggling to figure out what the benefit would be to Orono. Bremer noted the <br />Noerenberg Garden is a wonderful, well-used amenity, and frequently hosts groups from around the <br />metro area that hold photography classes and other different events. Bremer stated in her view those <br />events are doing fine as they are and that she has a concern with adding more traffic to the roadways as <br />well as joggers and bikers. <br /> <br />Bremer stated she personally likes Minnetonka Beach’s approach, which was to send a letter, and that she <br />would recommend Orono do something similar. Bremer stated she also would like to still keep receiving <br />information on the scenic byway. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she also is not in favor of the scenic byway for the reasons already stated but especially <br />given the amount of traffic and the lack of economic benefit to Orono. Levang stated Noerenberg <br />Garden is already well used and that she does not really see how it would benefit Orono. Levang stated in <br />her opinion a letter would be sufficient and that she would also like to continue to receive information on <br />the progress or lack of progress being made on the project. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 06/09/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/27/2014 <br />[Page 20 of 23]