My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
09-16-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:38:01 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 3:28:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19 2013 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 24 of 28 <br /> <br />garden/vegetable areas. In this particular case they would be looking at an association that would require <br />the payment of monthly dues to conduct the mowing and snow plowing. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked what the City’s infrastructure is like in this area to support this type of density. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Staff has not gotten to the point to determine sewer and water capacity but that he <br />would expect there would be capacity for 50 units. <br /> <br />Masmoen stated they are looking for the reaction of the Planning Commission and whether the City <br />would be receptive to rezoning this area. <br /> <br />Lemke asked if he has gotten the reaction from the residents in the surrounding area. <br /> <br />Wasmoen indicated they wanted to obtain the reaction of the City first and then further develop the plan <br />before gaining public input. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated the amount of traffic would obviously increase and asked whether the L-shaped entry <br />onto Shadywood is for sure or whether access to the site has yet to be determined. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated if that access is not available, they would loop back on the other side. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked where access to the church is located. <br /> <br />Wasmoen pointed out the location of the church. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated he is attempting to determine how the curb cuts would work and noted that there is an <br />intersection in the vicinity. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated they would also look at whether access could be simplified given the two commercial <br />properties and that they would like to have the access further away from the intersection than what <br />currently exists. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked what the square footage of the units would be. <br /> <br />Wasmoen indicated they would likely range from 2,500 to 1,800 square feet. Wasmoen stated there <br />would probably be four different unit types. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked what type of materials would be utilized. <br /> <br />Wasmoen indicated they would have wood and brick exteriors and on the interior they would likely have <br />hardwood floors, custom millwork and kitchens as well as solid surface or granite countertops. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked whether there would be any architectural covenants to allow some flexibility in <br />construction. <br /> <br />Wasmoen displayed a composite view of the types of architectural components they are considering. <br />Each twin home would have its own personality. Wasmoen noted since they are dealing with a number of <br />grade changes and existing trees, the footprint will rotate somewhat as you maneuver the site. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 09/16/2013 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 08/19/2013 [Page 24 of 28]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.