Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 15, 2013 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 15 of 23  <br />  <br />In addition, the drainage issues have been resolved. Larson stated the neighbors should be controlling <br />their own water and the City should be controlling the water coming off the boulevard. Larson stated <br />they are willing to allow the water from the boulevard run on to this property and that they are willing to <br />work with the City to address the other drainage issues. Larson reiterated it is impossible for this property <br />to flood. <br /> <br />As it relates to traffic congestion, Larson noted this will be a two-bedroom house with a tuck-under <br />garage and should not result in significant increased traffic. Larson stated this project will also not result <br />in diminished values to the surrounding properties. Larson indicated this project will cost less than the <br />exterior stone on the house next door and that there is a well on the property. <br /> <br />Larson commented he is not sure who wrote the word commons on the plat drawing in the 1980s but that <br />this lot is private property. Larson indicated he does not see how granting the variance would be adverse <br />to the City’s Comprehensive Plan since this is a small 26’ x 40’ foot house. Larson noted they are <br />requesting lot width and lot area variances, which should be a shoo-in since a number of properties in the <br />city have been granted those. Larson indicated they can narrow the house if the City desires. <br /> <br />Larson noted the property owners were told they cannot have a dock without a principal structure. If you <br />look at the tax records, it is classified as seasonal recreational. Lots classified as seasonal recreation on <br />Big Island are allowed to have a dock there with no house but yet these folks were denied a dock. Larson <br />stated if they are allowed to build a house, they would like to have a little dock. <br /> <br />Larson stated the property owner, Patricia Pfeffer, hired his company to sell the property and the sale is <br />subject to obtaining a permit to construct a house on the land. Larson stated he would encourage the <br />Planning Commission to review the 1978 letter from Mrs. Paige where was begging the City not to do <br />what they did. Mrs. Paige did not have professional representation at the meeting and was unable to <br />personally attend the meeting. The letter clearly states she and her husband owned the property since <br />1910 and that they never had any flooding on the property. Larson encouraged the Planning Commission <br />to correct the huge injustice that was done in 1978. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated one of the items the Planning Commission has to decide is whether the proposed house <br />is compatible and fits within the neighborhood. Schoenzeit asked how the applicant would address the <br />compatibility of this house versus the rest of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Larson stated the only house that will see this house is the big mansion. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked how this house and lot would compare to the rest of the other properties in the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Larson indicated he sells cabins across the street from million dollar homes every day around Lake <br />Minnetonka and that they can make the house fit within the setbacks. The proposed house is a nice <br />looking house and is about the size of the neighbor’s garage. Larson indicated the plan is not etched in <br />stone and that they will work with the City on the proposal. Larson noted they have constructed this <br />exact same house out in Mound on lots that were only 40 feet wide. Larson indicated they are not going <br />to put a radical, contemporary styled house with a flat roof on the property. The house will be located <br />down on the property and the neighbor on top of the hill will be looking at the side of the garage. Larson <br />stated by all rights they should be attempting to construct a 1,500 square foot print since that is what the <br />law allows for substandard lots. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 08/19/2013 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 07/15/2013