My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
06-17-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:24:03 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 2:54:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 20, 2013 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 25 <br /> <br />Devlin stated to his knowledge it has a foundation underneath the garage. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated there are masonry walls on the back and along one side, so it is his assumption it goes <br />down into the ground. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if the applicants are intending to incorporate any type of architectural features on the <br />structure that faces the neighbor to the north. <br /> <br />Devlin indicated they would like to make the structure architecturally please and so they would likely <br />incorporate a window on the first floor of the garage or some kind of architectural feature near the peak of <br />the roof. Devlin pointed out they will be raising the ground level of the dirt two or three feet up on the <br />garage to help hide some of the massing and then have landscaping around the garage. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if the City has heard from the neighbor. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated they have not and that the neighbor has been given notice of the application. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated his concern was whether the neighbors to the north were opposed to the project since <br />that is the most impactful view. <br /> <br />Devlin stated they would like to make the structure look attractive from the road. <br /> <br />Lemke asked whether any trees would be damaged as a result of the construction. <br /> <br />Devlin stated to his knowledge there is one tree and the tree is located slightly higher than the garage so <br />the construction should not impact it. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked where the landscaping will be located. <br /> <br />Devlin indicated it will be on the front of the garage as well as the backside which faces the neighbor’s <br />property. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if that will include some taller vegetation. <br /> <br />Devlin indicated they probably will have to have some taller shrubs in that area. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if they plan on re-grading the area between the house and the garage. <br /> <br />Devlin stated they have been observing the drainage for the past week and that they will be addressing <br />that. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked whether the City Engineer has reviewed the plans in terms of the drainage. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the survey does not include the drainage and will need to be added prior to the building <br />permit being issued. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has not made any recommendations at <br />this point. Once the survey has been updated, the City Engineer will review it for any possible changes <br />that may need to be made to the drainage. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 06/17/2013 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 05/20/2013 <br />[Page 3 of 25]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.