Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 20, 2013 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 23 of 25  <br />  <br />were a couple of tables in the code that talked about the protection classification, which is related to the <br />functional assessment. Staff attempted to put the two tables that were in the code into one and <br />acknowledge that the Watershed District is going to require buffers in certain situations and in keeping <br />with the City’s Surface Water Management Plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated Section 1605(c) establishes the new structure setback requirement from wetland edges and <br />provides the City with authority to require wetland boundary delineation subject to the Planning <br />Director’s determination of whether a Level 1 or a Level 2 delineation is required. Sections 1605 (d), (e) <br />(f), (g), (h), and (i) are deleted as these all relate to buffer establishment and maintenance, which will now <br />fall under the Watershed District’s jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Section 78-1607 is slightly revised to eliminate references to conditional uses in wetland buffers except to <br />address impacts on existing established buffers. Section 78-1608(2) establishes that wetland buffer <br />protection will be under the Watershed District’s jurisdiction and Section 78-1608(3) is revised by <br />addressing existing buffers in (a) and by deleting (c) and (d) which pertain to avoidance of future <br />nonconformities and buffer flexibility. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the proposed revisions to the wetland ordinance functionally transfer the authority for <br />requiring wetland buffers in Orono to the Watershed District. Staff believes that this code revision is <br />neither in conflict with the provisions of the 2011 Orono Surface Water Management Plan nor the <br />provisions of the 2008-2030 Community Management Plan. <br /> <br />The Watershed District buffer rules will not apply to existing single-family residential properties, which <br />should eliminate the primary issues the City has encountered in enforcing the current ordinance. The <br />ability to conduct a relatively inexpensive and less time-consuming Level 1 wetland delineation in <br />specified situations will make administration of the wetland setback ordinance more efficient. <br />Thiesse asked if the City is doing any injustice to the wetlands by revising their standards. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion they are not. The ordinance establishes a 35-fot setback, which will provide <br />a greater level of protection. Gaffron stated buffers are a good thing, but would avoid forcing them on <br />people in situations where a private homeowner simply wants to do a small project that then evolves into <br />something much more extensive than they had any expectation of. In addition, some of the regulations <br />are difficult to administer and it is expensive for the property homeowners. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in his view the Watershed District is going to do a good job enforcing their regulations and <br />that he is comfortable with where the City is headed with this. <br /> <br />Lemke and Schoenzeit commented it is a nice job by Staff. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 8:33 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 8:33 p.m. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit moved, Thiesse seconded, to recommend approval of Application 313-3601, City of <br />Orono, Wetland Ordinance Amendment. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 06/17/2013 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 05/20/2013 <br />[Page 23 of 25]