Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18, 2013 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 2 of 35  <br />  <br />Staff has received updated comments today regarding the applicant’s revised plan from the adjacent <br />property owner who provided initial comments. The revised survey and detailed garage plans better <br />clarify the existing usable space within the applicant’s garage. Staff continues to find that creating a <br />more nonconforming structure is not in character with the neighborhood. The revised addition adds mass <br />within the eastern side setback area and also within the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />The applicant has not demonstrated a reasonable practical difficulty supporting additional structure within <br />the average lakeshore setback or within the 75-foot setback area. Further, the applicant has failed to <br />demonstrate that enforcing the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive them of the reasonable use of <br />the property. <br /> <br />Planning Staff continues to recommend denial of the variances. <br /> <br />Lixiao Wang, Applicant, stated they have downsized their proposal. Wang indicated they currently have <br />three cars, with two of those vehicles being a truck and an SUV which do not fit into the garage. Wang <br />stated if they do not do this project, they will have to continue to park the cars outside. <br /> <br />Wang noted the neighbor’s house is up higher than his and that the trees currently block the view from the <br />neighbors. Wang pointed out the location of the trees on the overhead. <br /> <br />Wang indicated their new proposal has been reduced by three feet, which does not provide any additional <br />space for boats or other equipment and that they are basically asking for a basic three-car garage. Wang <br />stated if they reduce the proposed garage any further, their cars will not fit in the garage. Wang stated this <br />is the best option they have. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if there are three garage doors now. <br /> <br />Wang indicated there are two. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he did visit the property and that he recalled a two-door garage and something else without <br />a garage door. <br /> <br />Wang indicated there are not three doors. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. <br /> <br />Leskinen indicated her position has not changed from the last meeting and that in her view there is still a <br />considerable amount of massing near the shoreline. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated the other point is if fairly common vehicles do not fit in the garage that obstructs the <br />neighbor’s view already and the cars will remain parked outside, that is worth some consideration. As <br />proposed, the vehicles will be put away inside a symmetrical building rather than sitting outside, which <br />seems to make sense. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 01/21/14* <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/2013 <br />[Page 2 of 35]