My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03-17-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:02:27 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 2:20:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, February 18, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 11 <br /> <br />Leskinen asked whether the applicant has spoken with any church officials about them doing landscaping <br />on their side of the property. <br /> <br />Goodwin stated they started the discussion last fall with the church and the husband of the property owner <br />indicated he would be agreeable to the fence and was even willing to build the fence himself, which might <br />still happen. Goodwin indicated he did not discuss the height of the fence with him at all. <br /> <br />Leskinen indicated she visited the property on Sunday and that she walked in the parking lot but did not <br />go into the amphitheater due to the snow. Leskinen stated due to the elevation of the Leaf Street property, <br />it would be possible to see over any size fence and that she is attempting to figure out how any size fence <br />would make any difference in terms of screening. <br /> <br />Lemke noted the applicant did indicate the fence would also act as a sound barrier. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated she is not sure whether an 8-foot fence would make that much difference in terms of a <br />sound barrier versus a 6-foot fence. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he understands the need to keep a fence at the allowable 6-foot height but that he is not <br />sure whether anyone would know it is an 8-foot fence given the topography. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit commented an 8-foot fence would not harm anyone. Schoenzeit stated if the weddings are <br />happening on a regular basis, in his view it would be a pretty severe hardship. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated this would be a location where he could see a separation of the properties. <br /> <br />McGrann noted three of the property owners are supportive of the fence and that no representative from <br />the church has expressed any opposition to the fence. <br /> <br />Thiesse commented he would not want to have to deal with it every weekend and that noise is a hardship <br />in his view. <br /> <br />Leskinen commented the appearance of the fence would not change based on whether it is a 6-foot high <br />fence or an 8-foot high fence. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit noted the variance is very specific to this property and what it is attempting to do. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the Planning Commission would be at risk of setting a precedent. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted there are not too many churches located in residential neighborhoods. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that it would not set a precedent. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked how long the church has been engaged in performing commercial wedding activities. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated there was a church in the approximate location of the McCarthy residence until the mid <br />1970s when it burned down. There have been weddings performed at the church since at least 1978 when <br />that church burned down. Gaffron stated the subdivision of the property that created Oxford Road <br />initially had the McCarthy, the Goodwin, and one other property platted as an outlot. Gaffron indicated <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 03/17/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 02/18/2014 <br />[Page 4 of 11]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.