My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03-17-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:02:27 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 2:20:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, February 18, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />5. #14-3652 ROGER AND NAN HAWKINSON, 570 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH, <br />VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT, 7:07 P.M. – 7: 15 P.M. <br /> <br />Roger and Nan Hawkinson, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated in 2006, the City approved the vacation of the 12-foot wide alley which extended south from <br />Dickenson Street to Fox Street. At the time of the vacation, the City retained utility easements over the <br />alley. The applicant now wishes to combine the three parcels with the vacated alley into one buildable <br />property. In order to create a larger, more central building location, the utility easements must be vacated. <br /> <br />The City sewer lines run in Orono Orchard Road, Dickenson Street, and Barrett Avenue. There is an <br />existing sewer easement running east to west on the south side of the applicants’ property from Barrett <br />Avenue which contains the sewer line serving their property. This existing easement is on the adjacent <br />property and is not proposed to be vacated. <br /> <br />The public utilities serving this area have been contacted regarding their use of the easement area. With <br />the exception of Mediacom, each of the utilities have responded. The only utility noting they have <br />facilities within the vacated alley/easement area was Xcel Energy. The others have noted they have no <br />objections to its vacation. Xcel indicates that there is an existing power pole on the northern part of the <br />vacated alley on the applicants’ property for which an easement is needed. The applicants’ survey does <br />not identify this power pole and Xcel has indicated they may need to conduct a survey to define the area. <br />Retention of a small easement in this area will not affect the intended building site. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the easement vacation with the provision that a utility easement is <br />retained in the location of the existing Xcel facilities. <br /> <br />Hawkinson indicated he had nothing to add to Staff’s report. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked what is being vacated if a portion of the utility easement is to remain and what its <br />purpose is. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the other utilities would include electric, cable, gas, and phone. Gaffron stated the City <br />might someday provide water to the property but not in the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked if the easement would allow for underground and overhead. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it is both. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked what could not be done if the easement remained. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 03/17/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 02/18/2014 <br />[Page 8 of 11]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.